Anabolic Innovations 1st PH

2-cyano-17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-androst-3-one - 10mg

SD is double methylated, whereas Cynostane has a methyl and cyano "function group".

At least this is what my brotelligence comes up with.

The slightest change in a molecule can drastically alter physiological effects.

Ex. 1-Testosterone vs. Methyl-1-Testosterone, EQ vs. Dianabol (methylated boldenone), etc.

According to the label, this is not the same molecule as superdrol.

A clone of what? Not SD. Unless "cyano" is nomenclature for "methyl". And your statement doesn't make any sense... "produce same results as any other steroid" ?? If everything had the same effects, there would be only one steroid.

Why do you disagree with everything?

Do you honestly think this is going to be the best PH out?


I meant it's nothing special. Gain a couple of pounds, side effects, and keep whatever you can hold on to. Like i said, the same as everything else.

I don't.

I never said anything close to that.

Just because you can't gain on copious amounts of steroids doesn't mean others cannot.

I think I saw somewhere it was like 800:80 anabolic:androgenic.

Yeah, the guy running a log of it looked it up in Vida and seems to be halfway knowledgeable about it. He quoted that A:A ratio from there. Looks great on paper, but the logs will tell us the rest of the story.

methyl EQ is Boldenone actetate, the whole dbol is methyl EQ is a myth. Just pointing that out. they have some structural similarities but they are completely different compounds by structure and mechanisms of action. I just wanted to clear up that bit of misinformation. No disrespect shakes

Just effin.

Absolutely dude. Pics dont lie. You o happen thave any links to these logs? Are they over at AM? If so i'll search tomorrow.

Speaking of "On Paper"....A lot of things DO NOT make sense to me. This new gear is 800:80 which sounds extremely anabolic.

But then you look at something like Halo which is shitty for mass, and its 1900:850

Dbol, a mass gear @ 150:50

Winny, 320:30...mostly anabolic yet NOBODY uses it for bulking.

Does anyone here know if the Anabolic ratio dictates how strongly it will bind to the AR? Or are the numbers irrelevant to that?

Well, I havent really heard much hype over this new designer.

Which is probably a plus when you think of all the rep hype over The One.

I did epi and transdermal 4-AD. Went pretty well, but I think I messed up my dosage of the 4-AD due to a good bit of the mixed solution having evaporated. I gained a decent amount of mass, which has largely been kept about 2 weeks into PCT so far.

Another kind of unplanned thing was running out of nolva after a week at 40 mg. I did have torem on hand, so I dosed that at 120 for 4 days and will do 60 for a couple more weeks. i think that should be fine, if kind of disorganized. Gotta get my stuff laid out a little better next time around.

I like learning. I've read that at every major board I've visited. You are the first person to say otherwise.

BANNED!

From steroid.com...

"A simple way to think of Equipoise, chemically at least, is simply as Dianabol without the 17-alpha-methyl group "

I've read that the ratios are a starting place, but not to give them too much weight. Of course, I'm not a steroid guru and just pass along some info I pick up from reading on the Net. I try to disseminate the good info from the bad, but as DT pointed out, sometimes I FAIL!

I thought 1-testosterone (dihydroboldenone) was the 5a reductace version of EQ.

the H from the OH group is still present if its boldenone base.
However the H is stripped away via dehydration synthesis, leaving an Oxygen molecule thats allowed to bond to a carbon, in this case, an ester (boldenone acetate, undecyclate, etc)

Not sure. I saw a reference to PA in Trauma1's log but nothing specific about what he had said about it. DMT would make it closer to phera than sd. The log is supposed to be really detailed but as yet, he hasn't noticed much.

This just came out. I don't think Ben's been around in a while to have ever logged this.

I was mistaken... he just started a "The One" log.

http://forums.bulknutrition.com/?showtopic=45909&hl=

Not sure why I thought it was Cynostane.

btw, Josh, hittin' you up e-mail this evening.