Best supp no pct

1Fast400 Forums > Supplements



Posted by: flex13 Aug 18 2008, 07:55 PM
I am looking for a good supp to add some solid muscle but a need a sup that does not require pct/shut my natty test down at all. I have been doing a lot of research trying to find the best supp that wont shut me down but it is pretty difficult to do because of all the different choices and trying to figure out wat works or doesnt. Let me no wat u bros think, I have a few choices but just cant make a final decision....

Posted by: accent115 Aug 18 2008, 07:59 PM
x-factor, anabolic pump, creatine

Posted by: flex13 Aug 19 2008, 11:15 AM
QUOTE (accent115 @ Aug 18 2008, 07:59 PM)
x-factor, anabolic pump, creatine

Thanks bro

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 19 2008, 11:21 AM
QUOTE (accent115 @ Aug 18 2008, 07:59 PM)
x-factor, anabolic pump, creatine

pretty good list

Posted by: Stephen57799 Aug 19 2008, 11:44 AM
Drive + RPM

Posted by: On3musta Aug 19 2008, 02:01 PM
cissis-drol, mass-fx, and the others said

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 19 2008, 04:38 PM
Any certain category you are looking for?

Lots of good options above... I am partial to a couple of them smile.gif.
Also, 6-oxo is a good product thats pretty safe, as is Activate. X-Factor you have to research and make your own judgment call on.

Another to consider is Neovar.... quickly becoming my favorite supplement.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 19 2008, 06:39 PM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 19 2008, 11:31 AM)
icariin, androstrenetrione,


formestane?

icariin - pretty good for its osteogenic and NO properties, but with horribly estrogenic metabolites, i'd stay far far away

androstenetrione - a decent AI stacked with an androgen, but alone, its too anti-androgenic, and it barely dampens estrogen production. i would only use during a non-aromatizing steroid cycle, only as a means to elevate sex drive

formestane - completely badass prohormone. nuff said

Posted by: david100proof Aug 19 2008, 06:42 PM
SIZE-ON

Posted by: flex13 Aug 19 2008, 08:06 PM
QUOTE (david100proof @ Aug 19 2008, 06:42 PM)
SIZE-ON

Thanks for the help bros ive narrowed it down lol.......

Powerfull
xfactor
mass fx
hyperdrol

Also ive been reading a lot about these two supps soon to be out

max-out

and prime

Posted by: tree33 Aug 19 2008, 10:13 PM
Now Foods Tribulus 1000mg

Take 6,000mg a day no pct needed

Take 3,000mg 2-3 hours prior to lifting

Take the other 3,000mg Right before bed.

Enjoy the strength and size difference.

Posted by: adisio Aug 20 2008, 10:39 AM
Yeah i had some estro problems with tribulus as well. I thought that stuff was mild before i started taking it and then i started getting itchy nipples and they started to feel little puffy. Maybe i was just getting parenoid and made my self think that, but i am still willing to give it another try.

Supplement with no pct needed, JW would be ok if you take low doses and stay on it for no more then 4 weeks.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 20 2008, 11:26 AM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:34 AM)
DIESEL:

icariin has estrogenic metabolites?  im very sensitive to estro and had no problems with horny goat weed at doses upwards and over 2g a day of either.... tribulus gives me more estro sides than HGW or icariin does... interesting

I like to stack inhibit E (only one cap at night) with ZMA, icariin, horny goat weed, maca, and powerfull

i get more compliments now than I ever have as far as size and strength, however, im nowhere near as cut as I used to be, which is due to myself not using steroids any longer.


formestane a prohormone? explain....


Icariin has a metabolite that is 94% as strong as estradiol.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16323292?ordinalpos=5&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

As discussed on the thread, the amount of metabolite produced will be dependent on the individual:

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=85578543&postcount=8

So the higher percent icariin extract, the more likely the estrogenic metabolites will be produced.

Formestane (4OHA) is the prohormone to 4-hydroxytestosterone (4OHT).

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1284430...Pubmed_RVDocSum

Posted by: accent115 Aug 20 2008, 12:23 PM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 12:03 PM)
Diesel, the odd thing is, tribulus seems to cause wayyy more estro related sides vs icariin.....

as pointed out, most ppl are sensitive to tribulus which purportedly has low estro sides....

tribulus really doesn't have much effect on testosterone levels

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 20 2008, 12:27 PM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 12:03 PM)
Diesel, the odd thing is, tribulus seems to cause wayyy more estro related sides vs icariin.....

as pointed out, most ppl are sensitive to tribulus which purportedly has low estro sides....

The latest research has demonstrated tribulus's capacity to stimulate DHEA.

As you know, DHEA and its metabolite (5A) can directly stimulate estrogen receptors.

For me, tribulus elicits no estrogenic sides, possibily because it has more of an antagonistic nature towards progestrogenic receptors. It also attaches weakly to SHBG, freeing testosterone - as do a lot of phytohormones.

Posted by: accent115 Aug 20 2008, 12:43 PM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 12:36 PM)
so since tribulus can easily stimulate DHEA, it can increase testosterone, and estrogen, right? the progesterone affects make sense, if someone gets estro sides from trib, its prob actually progesterone.


How come I can dose icariin at high doses and get no sides?

He said the metabolites produced are individually based

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 20 2008, 01:25 PM
QUOTE (accent115 @ Aug 20 2008, 12:43 PM)
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 12:36 PM)
so since tribulus can easily stimulate DHEA, it can increase testosterone, and estrogen, right?  the progesterone affects make sense, if someone gets estro sides from trib, its prob actually progesterone.


How come I can dose icariin at high doses and get no sides?

He said the metabolites produced are individually based

Exactly.

Icariin is metabolized in the gut by natural bacterial flora.

People have different flora depending on many different factors (ethnicity, food choice, exc).

For example, if you take an oral antibiotic, the natural flora will be disrupted and can be replaced by a different bacterial population (or %).

Some people can digest particular foods better than others, which would influence the amount of metabolites produced (gastrointestinal pharmacokinetics).

Posted by: richard gears Aug 20 2008, 03:08 PM
just never come off gears!

glad i could help!

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 20 2008, 05:31 PM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 20 2008, 01:29 PM)
If icariin is a testosterone mimetic, when metabolized it acts like test in the body, right?  It has no affects on test levels?


all I know is trib gives me gyno like sides at high doses and HGW and icariin do just the opposite...

The study which determined icariin to be a 'testosterone mimetic' was performed on hypogonadal mice and is not relevent to normal humans. In order to make the mice hypogondal, they actually injected a toxin (cyclophosphamide i.p.) in order to damage their reproductive system.

As I said earlier, icariin's nitric oxide and osteogenic capability is well documented, but its estrogenic potential is a little worrying.

And if you are not experiencing negative estrogenic sides from supplementing with icariin, its definitely possible that you do not contain the necessary bacteria in order to metabolize it.

Keep in mind that unmetabolized icariin has zero estrogenic potential.

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 20 2008, 06:10 PM
There's quite a few factors that come into play on that Icariin being estrogenic topic.... and only 1 remotely worthwhile study saying so. The vast majority of research, studies, and feedback say the complete opposite. I only glanced at the study.... but didn't it mention the plant species cultivated plays a role as well?

As for Formestane, I have heard some good things on that. Does anyone know....Is it legal in natural organizations?

Posted by: flex13 Aug 20 2008, 06:50 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 20 2008, 06:10 PM)
There's quite a few factors that come into play on that Icariin being estrogenic topic.... and only 1 remotely worthwhile study saying so. The vast majority of research, studies, and feedback say the complete opposite. I only glanced at the study.... but didn't it mention the plant species cultivated plays a role as well?

As for Formestane, I have heard some good things on that. Does anyone know....Is it legal in natural organizations?

Thanks for all the good infro fellas...I am not very prone to gyno so i dont thin adding in the icariin would worry me to much..

Anyone have any advice on what I should stack i was thinkin this...

Powerfull
icariin
Blue gene

Not sure thought all suggestions are welcome

Posted by: On3musta Aug 20 2008, 06:54 PM
wtf? if trib gives you gyno are you guys saying you need a PCT for f**kin trib???? that doesnt make sense when people take it for part of pct? does it?

Posted by: accent115 Aug 20 2008, 07:00 PM
QUOTE (flex13 @ Aug 20 2008, 06:50 PM)
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 20 2008, 06:10 PM)
There's quite a few factors that come into play on that Icariin being estrogenic topic.... and only 1 remotely worthwhile study saying so.  The vast majority of research, studies, and feedback say the complete opposite.  I only glanced at the study.... but didn't it mention the plant species cultivated plays a role as well? 

As for Formestane, I have heard some good things on that.  Does anyone know....Is it legal in natural organizations?

Thanks for all the good infro fellas...I am not very prone to gyno so i dont thin adding in the icariin would worry me to much..

Anyone have any advice on what I should stack i was thinkin this...

Powerfull
icariin
Blue gene

Not sure thought all suggestions are welcome

I'd go with powerfull, icariin, and activate instead of the blue up. I'm pretty sure its just trib and longjack and divanil is better at freeing up shbg than both of those. That's only if you like those.

If i was you, I'd stack Powerfull with anabolic pump, as PF will raise test/gh sufficiently enough, the other will probably be over kill. Throw in some creatine as well. Cheap monohydrate.

Posted by: accent115 Aug 20 2008, 07:16 PM
QUOTE (On3musta @ Aug 20 2008, 06:54 PM)
wtf? if trib gives you gyno are you guys saying you need a PCT for f**kin trib???? that doesnt make sense when people take it for part of pct? does it?

You're taking that the wrong way, anything that disrupts your natural levels could potentially cause gyno, some are more likely because of the estrogenic metabolites like diesel explained. But anything that affects your levels could essentially cause gyno, depends on your body.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 20 2008, 10:39 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 20 2008, 06:10 PM)
There's quite a few factors that come into play on that Icariin being estrogenic topic.... and only 1 remotely worthwhile study saying so. The vast majority of research, studies, and feedback say the complete opposite. I only glanced at the study.... but didn't it mention the plant species cultivated plays a role as well?

The vast majority of research, studies, and feedback say the complete opposite.

No study has ever said icariin's metabolites are anti-estrogenic (that would be the complete opposite, no?).

Icariin's metabolites (2 of them, actually) are definitely estrogenic. The only point of conjecture is of the quantity metabolized upon ingestion. If it's a low amount, then it doesn't matter. The inverse is also true.

but didn't it mention the plant species cultivated plays a role as well?

The studies cited used a 97% extract. The source become irrelevent at this percentage as it is considered pure.

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 21 2008, 11:35 AM
I had a discussion with one of our owners- Dirk Tanis.....who is in charge of all formulation. Here's what I got back as a summary of all he explained to me. To think ANY human has this info stored to memory is amazing to me.... I just listened, took notes, and got busy researching. Right on the money.


The aims of the present study were to determine the estrogenic activities of icariin (ICA) and its derivatives and their structure-estrogenic activity relationship. Therefore, icaritin (ICT) and desmethylicaritin (DICT) were derived from ICA.


This means that some sort of chemical process occurred to get ICT and DICT from icariin- this is not listed in the abstract, nor are the enzymatic reactions to convert ICA to ICT and DICT listed. Case in point, testosterone is derived from sissal waste product, and other organic substances. Can you up your testosterone by eating a bunch of sissal? Not very likely- but if you chemically derive testosterone from sissal through enzymatic reactions (which the human body cannot perform on its own), you can come up with an end product of testosterone. The fact that these two substances had to be derived from icariin alone disqualifies his reasoning. If the two substances were icariin metabolites and the clear enzymatic process was listed, that would be a different story.

As a flavone, Icariin is an estrogen antagonist by nature, meaning that it can mitigate estrogenic effects by competing with estrogen for receptor sites, but does not mimic the action of estrogen. Estrogen antagonists, SERMs, and SARMs can also increase bone mass, elevate mood, and positively alter the T:E reatio. There is also evidence (and this is true among many estrogen antagonists, SERMs, and SARMs) that by mediating estrogenic effects through antagonistic actions, there can be cross-talk with the androgen receptor, and icariin also has some effects as a glucocorticoid antagonist as well- meaning that it can lower cortisol levels.

The estrogenic activities of ICA, ICT and DICT were examined by cell proliferation and progestogen receptor mRNA expression of estrogen-receptor-positive MCF-7 cells.Current studies exhibited that ICT and DICT both markedly enhanced the proliferation of MCF-7 cells; as compared to estradiol (100%), their relative proliferative effects (RPE) were 90% and 94%, respectively. Cell proliferation induced by ICT and DICT was completely antagonized by ICI182,780. ICT and DICT increased progestogen receptor (PR) at mRNA levels at 48 h after treatment, although the effects were not as prominent as 17beta-estradiol (E2). Those phenomena were not observed with ICA. Results demonstrate that ICT and DICT (nonconjugated forms) possess estrogen-like activity; however, ICA appears to have no estrogenicity in the MCF-7 cell lin e model in vitro.


The study clearly states that ICA has no effect on estradiol, and has no estrogenicity itself. And we use ICARIIN, not ICARIINS- this is why smile.gif Icariins can contain all of these other estrogenic substances and microfractions- icariin clearly does not.

Posted by: On3musta Aug 21 2008, 01:42 PM
so if your prone to gyno, what product would you guys suggest to help boost natty test levels? HGW?

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 21 2008, 03:23 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 21 2008, 11:35 AM)
I had a discussion with one of our owners- Dirk Tanis.....who is in charge of all formulation. Here's what I got back as a summary of all he explained to me. To think ANY human has this info stored to memory is amazing to me.... I just listened, took notes, and got busy researching. Right on the money.


The aims of the present study were to determine the estrogenic activities of icariin (ICA) and its derivatives and their structure-estrogenic activity relationship. Therefore, icaritin (ICT) and desmethylicaritin (DICT) were derived from ICA.


This means that some sort of chemical process occurred to get ICT and DICT from icariin- this is not listed in the abstract, nor are the enzymatic reactions to convert ICA to ICT and DICT listed. Case in point, testosterone is derived from sissal waste product, and other organic substances. Can you up your testosterone by eating a bunch of sissal? Not very likely- but if you chemically derive testosterone from sissal through enzymatic reactions (which the human body cannot perform on its own), you can come up with an end product of testosterone. The fact that these two substances had to be derived from icariin alone disqualifies his reasoning. If the two substances were icariin metabolites and the clear enzymatic process was listed, that would be a different story.

As a flavone, Icariin is an estrogen antagonist by nature, meaning that it can mitigate estrogenic effects by competing with estrogen for receptor sites, but does not mimic the action of estrogen. Estrogen antagonists, SERMs, and SARMs can also increase bone mass, elevate mood, and positively alter the T:E reatio. There is also evidence (and this is true among many estrogen antagonists, SERMs, and SARMs) that by mediating estrogenic effects through antagonistic actions, there can be cross-talk with the androgen receptor, and icariin also has some effects as a glucocorticoid antagonist as well- meaning that it can lower cortisol levels.

The estrogenic activities of ICA, ICT and DICT were examined by cell proliferation and progestogen receptor mRNA expression of estrogen-receptor-positive MCF-7 cells.Current studies exhibited that ICT and DICT both markedly enhanced the proliferation of MCF-7 cells; as compared to estradiol (100%), their relative proliferative effects (RPE) were 90% and 94%, respectively. Cell proliferation induced by ICT and DICT was completely antagonized by ICI182,780. ICT and DICT increased progestogen receptor (PR) at mRNA levels at 48 h after treatment, although the effects were not as prominent as 17beta-estradiol (E2). Those phenomena were not observed with ICA. Results demonstrate that ICT and DICT (nonconjugated forms) possess estrogen-like activity; however, ICA appears to have no estrogenicity in the MCF-7 cell lin e model in vitro.


The study clearly states that ICA has no effect on estradiol, and has no estrogenicity itself. And we use ICARIIN, not ICARIINS- this is why smile.gif Icariins can contain all of these other estrogenic substances and microfractions- icariin clearly does not.

Vitruvian,

I've already discussed what you posted. The metabolites talked about in that study were shown to be derived from gut bacteria in the normal flora.

i.e. When the molecule icariin is ingested, it TURNS IN TO the icariin metabolites cited above.

There is no "unnatural enzymatic" reaction taken place. Nice try though!

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 21 2008, 04:29 PM
You make it sound like I was trying to pull a fast one or something.... LOL

I was simply presenting the facts the way I, as well as virtually all real world feedback, see them.

I can see where you are coming from, but don't feel it's accurate. I am still left wondering where it says how they derived the metabolites from Icariin, and I see no response to the other data stated that in my eyes greatly outweighs 1 study based on 2 metabolites.

Regardless, you say potato, I say potato.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 21 2008, 06:15 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 21 2008, 04:29 PM)
You make it sound like I was trying to pull a fast one or something.... LOL

I was simply presenting the facts the way I, as well as virtually all real world feedback, see them.

I can see where you are coming from, but don't feel it's accurate. I am still left wondering where it says how they derived the metabolites from Icariin, and I see no response to the other data stated that in my eyes greatly outweighs 1 study based on 2 metabolites.

Regardless, you say potato, I say potato.

This is not a situation of miscommunication.

I have the full-text which explains how the metabolites are relevant to the discussion.

This thread may explain some of the misunderstandings:

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showpost.php?p=85334223&postcount=1

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 21 2008, 08:31 PM
^ If I didn't know any better, I'd think someone is taking this quite personally! Never had your opinion questioned before? I am not trying to discredit you or argue man. Just stating a disagreement.

Example: So if I can post one study saying creatine has potential for a unwanted side effects, you gonna tell people not to use it, even though every other sign points to it being a go? No need to answer.... a back and forth will be pointless.

Regards.

Posted by: accent115 Aug 21 2008, 08:45 PM
Diesel is never wrong.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 21 2008, 11:39 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 21 2008, 08:31 PM)
^ If I didn't know any better, I'd think someone is taking this quite personally!  Never had your opinion questioned before?  I am not trying to discredit you or argue man.  Just stating a disagreement. 

Example:  So if I can post one study saying creatine has potential for a unwanted side effects, you gonna tell people not to use it, even though every other sign points to it being a go?  No need to answer....  a back and forth will be pointless. 

Regards.

The thread I mentioned used 4 or 5 different studies to prove my point.

So, it's not like I'm just randomly pulling this outa my ass.

BTW, Naringin is also estrogenic...

Nevertheless, NeoVar looks pretty good and Osteo-Sport appears pretty innovative, so good luck with that.

Also if I were you, I would have left out the "CGC2 Joint Regeneration Matrix," since it is absurdedly underdosed, and you already have a cissus product. The "Joint-Glide Mobility Complex" is interesting enough on its own to sell product (especially with the curcumin + piperine combo). If I was rich I'd pick up a bottle today. smile.gif

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 21 2008, 11:40 PM
QUOTE (accent115 @ Aug 21 2008, 08:45 PM)
Diesel is never wrong.

haha true story.

Posted by: Will109090 Aug 22 2008, 12:31 AM
So in terms of boosting test, which supplements would you guys say are the best in terms of cost-efficiency (bulk powders, cheaper than others?)?

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 22 2008, 06:32 AM
QUOTE (TheDiesel @ Aug 21 2008, 11:39 PM)
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 21 2008, 08:31 PM)
^ If I didn't know any better, I'd think someone is taking this quite personally!  Never had your opinion questioned before?  I am not trying to discredit you or argue man.  Just stating a disagreement. 

Example:  So if I can post one study saying creatine has potential for a unwanted side effects, you gonna tell people not to use it, even though every other sign points to it being a go?  No need to answer....  a back and forth will be pointless. 

Regards.

The thread I mentioned used 4 or 5 different studies to prove my point.

So, it's not like I'm just randomly pulling this outa my ass.

BTW, Naringin is also estrogenic...

Nevertheless, NeoVar looks pretty good and Osteo-Sport appears pretty innovative, so good luck with that.

Also if I were you, I would have left out the "CGC2 Joint Regeneration Matrix," since it is absurdedly underdosed, and you already have a cissus product. The "Joint-Glide Mobility Complex" is interesting enough on its own to sell product (especially with the curcumin + piperine combo). If I was rich I'd pick up a bottle today. smile.gif

Correct, you're not pulling it out of your ass.

You've PROVEN that Icariin METABOLITES have the POTENTIAL to be estrogenic, when converted by an ENZYME THAT THE HUMAN BODY DOES NOT HAVE. You have supported this with discussion by some VERY brilliant minds, your own included, who have HYPOTHESIZED that the bacteria in the human gut can THEORETICALLY produce enough of this enzyme to make a difference.

In the mean time, the extremely large elephant in the room shows that all this theory is not panning out..... because there are very few if any issues popping up with estrogenic effects resulting from Icariin. Not just with AN's products, but with any of the other icariin products that popped into the market shortly thereafter. You've held tight to icariin being estrogenic, but haven't address it's competition for estrogen receptor's coupled with icariin NOT being estrogenic. The additional drop in cortisol leads to a very positive skew of the T:C ratio.


As for Osteo-Sport.... it's a very good product, thanks. Nothing there is underdosed in use, and yes, we do have another cissus product. Multiple cissus products fro multiple markets and consumers.

Posted by: OmniRed Aug 22 2008, 10:16 AM
Man Vit - arguments follow you around buddy.

I might try the RPM Drive stack at some point... I seem to be randomly losing weight.

I have phases where i will add 10lbs in 2 months then lose 6-7 of them in 1-2 weeks. I dont understand it and it's really frustrating.

What sorts of crap can i expect from this stack?

please refrain from typing the "skin bursting pump" bullshit they make you post, be legit with me.

Posted by: willpiazza31 Aug 22 2008, 10:17 AM
QUOTE (OmniRed @ Aug 22 2008, 11:16 AM)
please refrain from typing the "skin bursting pump" bullshit they make you post, be legit with me.

laugh.gif laugh.gif

Posted by: OmniRed Aug 22 2008, 10:56 AM
QUOTE (joseph23573 @ Aug 22 2008, 10:29 AM)
omnired you must have a VERY active thyroid, right? always been kinda thin?

anabolics will be the only way to gain alot of weight, obviously.



"skin tearing pumps" can be experienced from that new NO shotgun from VPX. off the hook.

Im not very thin at all actually..

i mean 5'10 - 196-200lbs @ 12%bf is pretty stout.

I just roller coaster when gaining and losing weight. Diet's always consistent. training is consistent. Idk what the deal is with my body.

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 22 2008, 12:06 PM
QUOTE (OmniRed @ Aug 22 2008, 10:16 AM)
Man Vit - arguments follow you around buddy.

I might try the RPM Drive stack at some point... I seem to be randomly losing weight.

I have phases where i will add 10lbs in 2 months then lose 6-7 of them in 1-2 weeks. I dont understand it and it's really frustrating.

What sorts of crap can i expect from this stack?

please refrain from typing the "skin bursting pump" bullshit they make you post, be legit with me.

hahaha... you're tellin me man!

As for weight loss.... is most of it fat loss, water, lean mass?
And nope... not gonna mention a skin split. If I have mentioned that, I apologize. And you continue to act as if "they" tell me what to do. No one is directing my actions in the slightest, friend.

I am kinda hoping to see the full text of this study posted so I can see what Diesel is really basing his opinions on. I mean... let's think of this.... if bacteria in the gut can produce a lot of cellulase, then in theory shouldn't we be able to digest cellulose? I am curious as to whether cellulase levels used to convert the icariin are mentioned in the study, and then if it is known how much bacteria can produce in the human body.

As for naringin.... i'll post more later wink.gif

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 22 2008, 12:14 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 22 2008, 06:32 AM)
QUOTE (TheDiesel @ Aug 21 2008, 11:39 PM)
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 21 2008, 08:31 PM)
^ If I didn't know any better, I'd think someone is taking this quite personally!  Never had your opinion questioned before?  I am not trying to discredit you or argue man.  Just stating a disagreement. 

Example:  So if I can post one study saying creatine has potential for a unwanted side effects, you gonna tell people not to use it, even though every other sign points to it being a go?  No need to answer....  a back and forth will be pointless. 

Regards.

The thread I mentioned used 4 or 5 different studies to prove my point.

So, it's not like I'm just randomly pulling this outa my ass.

BTW, Naringin is also estrogenic...

Nevertheless, NeoVar looks pretty good and Osteo-Sport appears pretty innovative, so good luck with that.

Also if I were you, I would have left out the "CGC2 Joint Regeneration Matrix," since it is absurdedly underdosed, and you already have a cissus product. The "Joint-Glide Mobility Complex" is interesting enough on its own to sell product (especially with the curcumin + piperine combo). If I was rich I'd pick up a bottle today. smile.gif

Correct, you're not pulling it out of your ass.

You've PROVEN that Icariin METABOLITES have the POTENTIAL to be estrogenic, when converted by an ENZYME THAT THE HUMAN BODY DOES NOT HAVE. You have supported this with discussion by some VERY brilliant minds, your own included, who have HYPOTHESIZED that the bacteria in the human gut can THEORETICALLY produce enough of this enzyme to make a difference.

In the mean time, the extremely large elephant in the room shows that all this theory is not panning out..... because there are very few if any issues popping up with estrogenic effects resulting from Icariin. Not just with AN's products, but with any of the other icariin products that popped into the market shortly thereafter. You've held tight to icariin being estrogenic, but haven't address it's competition for estrogen receptor's coupled with icariin NOT being estrogenic. The additional drop in cortisol leads to a very positive skew of the T:C ratio.


As for Osteo-Sport.... it's a very good product, thanks. Nothing there is underdosed in use, and yes, we do have another cissus product. Multiple cissus products fro multiple markets and consumers.

You've PROVEN that Icariin METABOLITES have the POTENTIAL to be estrogenic, when converted by an ENZYME THAT THE HUMAN BODY DOES NOT HAVE.

QUOTE
Up to now, the interfering effects of the traditional chinese medicine on ES cells and their directional differentiation in vitro have not been investigated. Icariin (ICA), icaritin (ICT), and desmethylicaritin (DICT) (Figure 1) are constituents of Epimedium, a traditional Chinese herbal medicine that has many biological functions, particularly in cardiovascular function improvement, hormone regulation, immunological function modulation, and antitumor activity[9]. Our former work has shown that icariin can be metabolized to icartin and demethylicartin by human intestinal bacteria in vitro[10]


http://www.chinaphar.com/1671-4083/26/477.htm


Your entire argument was based on that, and since it is wrong, what else do you have?

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 22 2008, 12:25 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 22 2008, 06:32 AM)
As for Osteo-Sport.... it's a very good product, thanks. Nothing there is underdosed

Really?


CGC2 Joint Regeneration Matrix: 115mg

Cissus Quadrangularis (40% Phytosterols), Ascorbic Acid (vitamin C), Glucosamine Sulfate, Chondrotin Sulfate 90% (Chinese Bovine), MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)



Posted by: OmniRed Aug 22 2008, 12:47 PM
I'd assume it's a combination of the 3 Vit. Water, mass and fat.

So, what can i expect from the drive/rpm stack?

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 23 2008, 07:11 AM
QUOTE (OmniRed @ Aug 22 2008, 12:47 PM)
I'd assume it's a combination of the 3 Vit. Water, mass and fat.

So, what can i expect from the drive/rpm stack?

Well, I am not sure what you in particular could expect. If you're like most people, you'd find lean mass gains with simultaneous drops in body fat, increased energy and libido, and increased aggression and focus.

If you're like a lot of users, you'd even notice an anti-estrogen effect.


Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 23 2008, 07:14 AM
Diesel, Thanks. I assume that link is for the full study. I'll have a look later today or this weekend if I get a free moment.

As for Osteo-Sport.... I think you're looking at it as if it is a Cissus based product. it's not. It's a joint support formula. Yes, if that was the total package, i fully agree we'd have a problem... but it's multiple cap dosing, and the rest of the product is what truly makes it.

Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 23 2008, 07:17 AM
Naringin is an estrogen antagonist- it inhibits the action and biosynthesis of estrogenic compounds.....just by its chemical structure it can antagonize estrogen and have some effects on aromatization, but not convert directly to it....

It has a reduced 2(3) C=C bond w/ an aromatic hetercyclic skeleton of flavan (2-phenylbenzopyran)- good for estrogen-antagonistic properties, but not great for conversion......other compounds in this family are hesperidin and hesperitin (found in several studies to be anti-aromatases)

Posted by: Will109090 Aug 23 2008, 12:18 PM
115mg of all of that in one capsule? That is very underdosed.

I would really like to try AN's stuff, but you have to dose their products so high that it's not cost-efficient at all.

So I'm looking for the most cost-efficient natural hormonal stack you guys can come up with.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 23 2008, 12:55 PM
QUOTE (Vitruvian @ Aug 23 2008, 07:17 AM)
Naringin is an estrogen antagonist- it inhibits the action and biosynthesis of estrogenic compounds.....just by its chemical structure it can antagonize estrogen and have some effects on aromatization, but not convert directly to it....

It has a reduced 2(3) C=C bond w/ an aromatic hetercyclic skeleton of flavan (2-phenylbenzopyran)- good for estrogen-antagonistic properties, but not great for conversion......other compounds in this family are hesperidin and hesperitin (found in several studies to be anti-aromatases)

Naringin is "anti" estrogenic in only the CYP metabolic system - in that it inhibits an enzyme which sometimes activates estradiol.

Nevertheless, biologically, this makes VERY little difference.

The molecule itself has demonstrated an agonist effect towards the MCF-7 cell line. This means that it has a pro-estrogenic effect towards estrogen sensative cells. [1]

Secondly, naringin itself has only shown marginal binding affinity towards estrogen receptors, however its metabolic cousin - naringenin - is highly estrogenic! [2, 3]

And I don't know who taught you SAR, but you might need a little refresher course. [4]



References:
[1] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12967197?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

[2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10406482?ordinalpos=6&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

QUOTE
the flavonoid phytoestrogens genistein and naringenin were also identified as hSHBG ligands


[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naringin

QUOTE
It is metabolized to the flavanone naringenin in humans.


[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure-activity_relationship


Posted by: Vitruvian Aug 25 2008, 04:42 PM
That is a very interesting read to say the least. I won't lie and pretend to have breezed through it...... that took a long ass time. lol

You've provided a lot of valid points, and to be honest... I forfeit. I don't have the time or energy to continue, and you have made some points that I am not at a knowledge level to argue.

I will say that nothing has swayed my opinion though. I tried to do some searching thinking I had read 1 estrogen-like side effect report on one forum or another in regards to the Drive/RPM stack. I couldn't find it. I checked with a couple others who have not seen even a single one. I am of the opinion that the data, with the exceptions you noted, all points to the fact that the compound does not, in the vast majority of cases, have ANY estrogen related effects. Your research would support the potential for some, but it just does not appear to be occurring. I am still waiting to find the person who has enough of these cellulase producing bacteria that do not exist in sufficient quantities in the human body. I would think this person would have the ability to digest cellulose that none of the rest of us can.

I haven't even had the chance to look through your last post to review the links, but will do so in the coming days when I get a chance.

Posted by: TheDiesel Aug 26 2008, 08:15 PM
Accent115 is the only one with some sense around here.





j/k, you're cool too Joe. smile.gif

Posted by: accent115 Aug 26 2008, 08:23 PM
QUOTE (TheDiesel @ Aug 26 2008, 08:15 PM)
Accent115 is the only one with some sense around here.





j/k, you're cool too Joe. smile.gif

true that, ill pm u my new stack

Posted by: Will109090 Aug 26 2008, 11:12 PM
joseph, PM sent.