Reply to this topicStart new topic
Start Poll
> Old CNN Video Clip - 2003 Pre Iraq War, Was everyone Duped?
Posted: Jun 20 2008, 10:18 PM
Quote Post
We're Screwed!!!!!!!!!
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12492
Member No.: 15310
Joined: 17-January 04

 
It's interesting when you look back. It seems like everyone was for it until it got ugly.

Just goes to show that there is plenty of blame to go around for supporting Bush's war.

PMEmail PosterUsers Website Top
Posted: Jun 20 2008, 11:44 PM
Quote Post
Guru
12 Percent of Max Posts12 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 3646
Member No.: 109090
Joined: 29-March 06

 
Politicians also used the "patriotism" excuse to go to Iraq, along with peoples' emotions from 9/11.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 07:10 AM
Quote Post
We're Screwed!!!!!!!!!
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12492
Member No.: 15310
Joined: 17-January 04

 
When you look back, it does seem like a lot of people who are bitching about it now were all about it back in 2003.

Too bad the anthrax didn't take him out in 2001.

PMEmail PosterUsers Website Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 10:49 AM
Quote Post
re-he-he-heally?
15 Percent of Max Posts15 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 4559
Member No.: 60275
Joined: 19-January 05

 
Roids, CLEARLY you don't understand, everyone in the government was lied to by Bush who was the only person who knew the real truth behind it. Get with it! tongue.gif

"I beat my body and make it my slave." ~1 Corinthians 9:26-27

2006 ONBF Mr. Natural Ohio:
1st place Junior Under 24 division and best poser, 2nd place Novice Under 170 division, 2nd place Men's Open Lightweight



My Progression Video!
My Current BulkFest 200 Journal!!!
My Comprehensive Beginners Guide to Bulking! Read if you're new to this!
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 10:58 AM
Quote Post

0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 73
Member No.: 45301
Joined: 1-October 04

 
Let's see, Saddam said he had bio/chem weapons.

He refused to allow UN inspectors full access.

It was a known fact he had an active bio/chem program.

Clinton had indicted him for cooperating with Bin Laden


....I see no real reason to suspect Saddam would have WMD.
PM Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 03:07 PM
Quote Post
We're Screwed!!!!!!!!!
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12492
Member No.: 15310
Joined: 17-January 04

 
QUOTE (morgan45301 @ Jun 21 2008, 09:58 AM)
Clinton had indicted him for cooperating with Bin Laden

Uh, no he didn't.

Basically, I think the dems were on board because it seemed politically expedient at the time. Plus, if there was going to be a great victory at the end, they didn't want to be on the wrong side of history, having opposed it.

PMEmail PosterUsers Website Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 03:30 PM
Quote Post
re-he-he-heally?
15 Percent of Max Posts15 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 4559
Member No.: 60275
Joined: 19-January 05

 
QUOTE (Roids @ Jun 21 2008, 03:07 PM)
QUOTE (morgan45301 @ Jun 21 2008, 09:58 AM)
Clinton had indicted him for cooperating with Bin Laden

Uh, no he didn't.

Basically, I think the dems were on board because it seemed politically expedient at the time. Plus, if there was going to be a great victory at the end, they didn't want to be on the wrong side of history, having opposed it.

No way! You mean democratic politicians might jump on board of something for purely political gain? Surely not global warming though!

"I beat my body and make it my slave." ~1 Corinthians 9:26-27

2006 ONBF Mr. Natural Ohio:
1st place Junior Under 24 division and best poser, 2nd place Novice Under 170 division, 2nd place Men's Open Lightweight



My Progression Video!
My Current BulkFest 200 Journal!!!
My Comprehensive Beginners Guide to Bulking! Read if you're new to this!
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 03:47 PM
Quote Post
We're Screwed!!!!!!!!!
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12492
Member No.: 15310
Joined: 17-January 04

 
No, global warming is a proven fact. It's not even open for debate anymore. That's why Obama is gonna have us running our cars on pure water by 2030.

PMEmail PosterUsers Website Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 06:52 PM
Quote Post
I see "not bigs"....They're everywhere!
5 Percent of Max Posts5 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1726
Member No.: 103548
Joined: 19-February 06

 
QUOTE (morgan45301 @ Jun 21 2008, 10:58 AM)
Let's see, Saddam said he had bio/chem weapons.


Its deeper than that. Reagan sold and authorized the manufacturing of chemical weapons to Iraq for the sole purpose of waging chemical warfare against the Iranians in the 80's. So its not that He told us he had these so called WMD's...We knew, because WE gave it to him.

The Iraq war was a sham. Even if saddam still had any of these weapons left, there was no deploment system capable of threatening anyone in the U.S.

The only threat was to the heebs and iranians. And to claim we were protecting israel is a joke, considering they have a world class military with nuke capabilities. (thanks to us of course)

PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 06:57 PM
Quote Post
We're Screwed!!!!!!!!!
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12492
Member No.: 15310
Joined: 17-January 04

 
Werd. All we really have to do is let everyone know that if anyone fucks with the kykes, they'll be free to do whatever they need to do and we'll have their back if they need help. We need to stop making them come to us for permission to defend themselves.

PMEmail PosterUsers Website Top
Posted: Jun 21 2008, 08:49 PM
Quote Post
Newbie
0 Percent of Max Posts0 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 94
Member No.: 8311
Joined: 23-September 03

 
I think that whenever a country's leader doesn't do what we want them to, we either make them have an accident or if the threat runs deeper than that we paint them to be as ugly as possible and wage war on them.

We've done it all over the world. We use and abuse countries so that they become indebted to us and in our political pocket. It's called economic warfare. Meanwhile you'll notice that many of our political leaders are or were heads of large corporations that make millions off of underdevelped countries by developing them. So if they don't let us develop their country and exploit their resources, we find a reason to wage war. People wonder why we are so quick to rescue countries in need... why not we can use tax dollars to create an indebtedness that will funnel money into American corporations. We started this with Iran in the 50's and since have developed it and fine tuned it. Saudi was one country we did strictly in exchange for petrodollars, yet what we did in Iran and our westernizing of the middle east is what causes a lot of resentment and formation of terrorism.

You have to think if some country came over here and exploited us and our resources and told us how we should be doing shit, we would definitely retaliate.

"It ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get it and keep moving forward." ~ Rocky Balboa
PMEmail Poster Top
Reply to this topic
Start new topic
Start Poll
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Off Topic | Next Newest »
Topic Options