The Proof is Here |
1Fast400 Forums > Off Topic |
| Posted by: Roids May 3 2008, 06:53 PM |
| http://kwani.org/main/problems-facing-our-socialism-barak-h-obama/ His dad, although absent from BHS's life since he was 2, was a apparently great influence and inspiration in his life, hence the book "Dreams From My Father." If anyone had any doubt that this guy is a commie, this should put it to rest. We know have 100% undeniable proof. |
| Posted by: cc-10 May 3 2008, 06:54 PM |
| oh no a muslim comunist we can't have that we can't have Hillary b/c she will bleed all over the place |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 3 2008, 06:57 PM |
| would you give up the obama conspiracies roids? you're worse than fox news |
| Posted by: Roids May 3 2008, 08:28 PM |
| What a coincidence this kid's back all the sudden! |
| Posted by: RandyOrton May 3 2008, 09:31 PM |
| Schwarzenegger '08 |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 3 2008, 11:00 PM |
| i've been around, i just don't want to compete with your obama bashing spam |
| Posted by: Doogsy May 4 2008, 06:04 AM | ||
|
| Posted by: opfor101 May 4 2008, 12:33 PM |
| he would probably turn this country into a Neo Nazi fascist state. with Roids logic, then Arnold must be an extreme fascist. After all his father was in his life for much longer than Obama and his father. Arnolds father was a member of the Austrian Nazi Party. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 4 2008, 08:15 PM |
| I thought he was a Muslim? You can't be a communist and be Muslim. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 4 2008, 08:36 PM |
| he's a terrorist Muslim Communist that regularly attends a radical Baptist church /sarcasm |
| Posted by: JW32Hoops May 4 2008, 09:20 PM | ||
Its true, its all true. Don't trust him, he's only here to infiltrate us and destroy us from the inside out. |
| Posted by: Josh47933 May 5 2008, 12:11 AM |
| I doubt he's actually a Muslim or communist, but the fact remains that he sat in a church listening to a rabid racist preacher (and very close friend) for 20 yrs. He was never offended enough by what Wright said until JUST now? He can be a non-Muslim, non-communist and still be a very bad candidate if he can sit in the pews for 20 yrs. and not say a word about the tirades preached there. There's no way middle America will elect him president, no matter how much he smiles and talks about change. He's got an assload of baggage that he just won't be able to shed. |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 5 2008, 12:29 AM |
| I also find it funny that people claim the MSM is only taking certain clips from specific sermons and looping them. Do people honestly think those 3-5 examples of shitty things he said are the ONLY times he went off about how terrible the U.S. is to the black race in those 20 years that Obama was there? The U.S. has done more good for the black race than any other empire in this planet's past. |
| Posted by: JW32Hoops May 5 2008, 12:31 AM | ||
![]() Regards, Coastal Elitist |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 5 2008, 12:35 AM |
| Middle America also usually consists of the people that vote the most and have traditional American values. I was born and raised on the East Coast and am socially liberal to an extent, but I believe middle America is the last of a dying breed of traditional American values, all of which worked great for this country, and it seems the more progressive we become, the further down the spiral our moral society decays. Example, all of the gays and trannies in the Bay. I have no problem with them at all, but do people honestly think it's healthy for this nation to push homosexuality on today's youth? Another example, tons of sex on television. Don't get me wrong, I love seeing tits and ass as much as the next guy, but is it healthy for America? |
| Posted by: JW32Hoops May 5 2008, 09:17 AM | ||
We are puritans comparitavely speaking. In Europe, sex is not half as taboo as it is here. In the US, it's a major scandal everytime there's a "wardrobe malfunction" as if we don't know that people have nipples. On the other hand, we don't seem to have any problem at all with assloads of violence on television. Sex is a no-no, but you can watch people get shot, stabbed, blown up, etc? I say...bring on the nips and lets cut the bloodshed down a bit. I'm J-Dub and I've approved this message. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 5 2008, 10:14 AM | ||
Is this like the irrefutable truth , that McCain sold out his fellow Hanoi Hilton captives? |
| Posted by: Roids May 5 2008, 12:14 PM |
| My opinions evolve just like everyone elses. I accept that he's not a muslim, but his choice of churches doesn't exactly make it a relief. The company he has kept over the last 10-20 years (particularly Wright/Ayers) combined with the fact that he has the most liberal/leftist voting record in the US Senate, and his speaches that promise "change" and "hope" with virtually no substance, make it impossible for me to support him. In fact, I can't understand how anyone could support him, at this point, other than they just don't like the others and BHO.... well he just seems like a neat guy. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 5 2008, 12:52 PM | ||
you should be arguing the complete opposite...you have seen 3-5 clips of wright at his most extreme, looped over and over again on television...do you think that should be a fair representation of the man for the past 20 years that he was a pastor side note- i dont really care if wright hates america or thinks the governement invented AIDS. he's an American and can think whatever the hell he wants. this doesn't mean that his radical views on indoctrinated in all of the people he preaches to. i was raised Catholic and as I got older I realized I really didn't agree with much of anything about the Catholic church. people aren't always ignorant, especially someone as smart as obama. you can go to a church and enjoy a service without agreeing with every word of a sermon. the fact that this has become such a big deal infuriates me...let's focus on the issues and roids, look at obama's stances on health care, the economy, etc. before you go saying he offers no practical solutions. you sound like hillary saying he is all talk. obama just spoke near my school. i couldn't get a ticket, but from everything i have heard he spoke very specifically about the education and job problems faced by the people in this city and how he planned to fix them. people were inspired not because of his eloquent speech but because he gave them solutions. just because you might not agree with his solutions doesn't mean they aren't there his economic address just as an example... http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/03/27/827873.aspx |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 5 2008, 01:27 PM | ||
So now you don't like him becuase he's too liberal? Changing your story huh? |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 5 2008, 03:18 PM |
| Michael, his solution is to spend more on education. We've spent billions of dollars on the public school system, especially in the inner city, and look how far it's progressed? Dropout rates continue to increase, standards are lowered so the black kids can keep up. The Democrats always say more needs to be done about education, and there needs to be more spending. What they don't tell the people, and which is completely obvious if you just think a little, is that the Democrats have been running the education system in this country since the 1970s! If what they are doing isn't working, maybe it's time to look for other ways to deal with the problem? And don't tell me it's more money, because that certainly isn't it. Maybe school vouchers? The Democrats scream that it will be bad for the poor kids in the ghetto, but their parents are the first ones in line to sign up for vouchers! The Dems just don't want people to see this because then it goes against their bullshit, worthless argument for spending more on education because it results in higher taxes, something they love. They can have all the money in the world, but as soon as someone else as money, they want to take it away. And don't even start with Obama's health care plan. It will result in tax increases that will end up costing you and me more in the long run. And do you honestly want to give something as invaluable as your health over to the government? There's a reason why people come to the U.S. for complicated surgeries instead of going to Canada, Cuba, Sweden, or other countries with socialized medicine; we have the best quality of care. Once you turn it over to the government, quality will decrease significantly. There will be no reason for a doctor to perform well and help his patients because he'll be making the same amount of money, whether he sees 10 patients or 50 patients a day. One way to start decreasing the cost of health care in this country is if insurance companies would give incentives to healthy people, and charge unhealthy people more. If you eat healthy, exercise, and all of your tests come back very positive, you should receive a 10% cut in how much you pay to the insurance company. It's an incentive to be healthy, results in more money in your pocket, and will cost the insurance companies much less money in terms of care, thus lower costs for everyone. |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 5 2008, 03:27 PM | ||||
True, I do agree that we are a prude society due to people distorting the view of the human body. As for violence on TV, I guess there is a decent amount. But fuck it, bring on the pussy and guns! ![]() |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 5 2008, 03:31 PM | ||||||
Thats not a gun. |
| Posted by: Roids May 5 2008, 10:44 PM |
| God Damn! I was about to burn my NRA membership card till now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But seriously, if David Duke had been McCain's pastor for the last 20 years, would liberals be so quick to give him a pass? Of course not. So. why are the dems giving Obama a free pass on his past associations? The reason is that frankly, people on the far left aren't bothered by Wrights comments or the actions of William Ayers. It doesn't bother them a bit, so why should it bother them at all if their candidate has close relationships with this kind of trash? It doesn't. |
| Posted by: JW32Hoops May 5 2008, 11:37 PM | ||
First of all there's a big difference between Jeremiah Wright's sporadically insane comments over his 30 year career, and http://www.davidduke.com/. Second of all, you'd consider this a "free pass"? Dude's been taking nothing but heat for it and it hasn't stopped. Shit, he's got random ass dudes on bodybuilding forums using his pic with Wrights as their avatar. |
| Posted by: Roids May 6 2008, 08:49 AM |
| I was talking about his supporters giving him a free pass, not the hatas. It's mostly Fox Nuze giving him heat. If not for the fact that Wright is now basically trying to sabotage his campaign, Fox Nuze, and the help of great americans like Hannity, Boortz, Limbaugh, O'Rielly, etc, this woulda went away weeks ago. May it never die!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Posted by: Roids May 6 2008, 08:56 AM | ||
You're so right you're almost wrong for being so right! You and I both know why the democraps are against school vouchers and it hasn't jack fukkin shit to do with education or kids or poverty or any of the other things they pretend to give a shit about. It is about the teachers' union (aka National Education Association). The teachers' union has just as much lobbying power as big oil, big pharma, etc. Only, rather than having the repubs in their pockets, the dems are beholden to unions of all types and the last thing the TU wants to see is free market style competition in the govt school system, where tax $ would follow the student rather than go directly to the school system. This would mean that teachers and govt (aka public) schools would have to meet certain performance standards or cease to exist. Govt school teachers would lose their precious tenure because they would eventually be graded based on performance rather than years of service. We can't have that! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxoiZdBSi-g |
| Posted by: JW32Hoops May 6 2008, 09:11 AM | ||
idk about that. I barely watch Fox Noise and I still see Wright stuff a lot. MSNBC is my cable news channel of choice (surprise!) and they've been making me painfully aware of everything Wright says and how it affects Barack's campaign. Also, if you saw Meet The Press this weekend, Tim Russert led off the top with like 10 straight Wright questions. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 6 2008, 06:52 PM | ||
some good points there, but there is only so much you can do for public education when so much of the government budget is appropriated for other things...there is no reason US public schools should be lagging behind other countries "U.S. students finished 15th in reading, 19th in math and 14th in science - and in a study that only ranked 31 nations. " (OECD rankings) if war funding was put towards education there could be- * 21,510,598 full four-year scholarships to public universities * 7,689,734 new public school teachers * 58,770,981 chances for children to attend head-start you are simply wrong about the fact that it isn't money...have you ever been to an underfunded inner city school? do you really think those kids are getting an equal opportunity to succeed? i'm going to be in thousands and thousand of dollars of debt when i leave school. obama offers a plan that would help me out (tax credit system)...i want the president of the US to change the priorities of this country. as for health care, you (i assume) are insured and in good health. not everyone is as fortunate as you. the government's job is to serve the needs of the people, and in a country where people die or are sick because they cant afford medical treatment, the government is not doing its job. we spend 16% of our GDP on health care, far and away more than any other country. our system is inefficient and exclusive. incentives are a great idea but they can only go so far. take a look at obama's plan on his website, i think it really covers a lot of the concerns you are voicing. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/healthcare/ http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/healthcare/ http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/19ba2f1c-c03f-4ac2-8cd5-5cf2edb527cf.htm i think hillary and obama both have good plans, mccain, in my opinion doesn't go nearly far enough |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 6 2008, 07:32 PM |
| Education in America sucks, becuase there aren't many smart people going into education anymore. The few talented people left, are leaving, becuase they have to put up with so much shit, for mediocre pay. The rules they have to follow are amazing. I know a teacher who got reprimanded for warning a student who threatened her with violence, that she would fight back. |
| Posted by: Roids May 6 2008, 10:09 PM | ||
That's the problem. If we just raise taxes a bit more on the wealthy then teachers could carry tasers and this wouldn't happen! |
| Posted by: ftank May 7 2008, 12:23 PM | ||
Lemme guess, you'd be ok paying this tax for the rest of your life? Just so you can go to school? You're going to pay for it one way or the other. I'd rather you find a way to pay for it yourself, not force a tax on me to pay for you to attend higher education. Same thing for health care. Call me heartless, but it's not everyone's problem if an individual isn't capable of taking care of themselves, or was some-how born less fortunate. I also think school systems should be regulated at the State level, not Federal. It's hard to concern yourself with the local community when you're dealing with international affairs. Which, IMO, is the point of a Federal fucking Government. That, and to keep the States straight. And Az, you could say the exact same thing about Health Care. With the risk of litigation, it's no wonder health care costs are so outrageous. Who the fuck would want to get into that turmoil? Who would want that health care? I'm sorry, but the Hive Mind is not how I expected the future to pan out. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 7 2008, 01:24 PM |
| [ I'd rather you find a way to pay for it yourself, not force a tax on me to pay for you to attend higher education./QUOTE] <br><br><br>well fine, I'd rather have someone else pay for a war that i don't support...you pay taxes already, its the way the money is allocated that is the problem. military spending is absurd, the Iraq war has been catastrophic for our economy, and now a huge portion of our federal budget goes towards interest. all i want is for my tax dollars to be as beneficial to the country as possible, and i feel like education and health care are two damn good ways to spend that money |
| Posted by: ftank May 7 2008, 01:45 PM | ||
I agree with you on the military funding and the re-allocation of funds. Why not start with more important things like the provision of food? Local housing? Otherwise, fund our government's employees (president, supreme court, senate) and regular maintenance of the military -- THEN REFUND THE REST BACK TO THE PEOPLE. There's no fuckin' way 40% of my income is necessary to fund our Federal Government. Let the people do their own thing with "their" money. Personally, I coulda used a portion of the multi-trillion dollar expendature in Iraq/Afghan, or some of the $15 billion spent on AIDS in Africa. If there was a way to opt-out of a universal health care tax because your company already supplies the best, cheapest health care in the nation -- damn, that'd be a good fuckin' idea. If my company didn't offer the coverage it did, it would lose a significant portion of its employee base. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 7 2008, 01:45 PM | ||||
Exactly, and Health care is fucked up too. |
| Posted by: Roids May 7 2008, 02:28 PM |
| When people talk about those who don't have access to healthcare, I always like to ask is question. How many people have you known who, when they get sick or injured, can not get care? If you look at the # of people who don't have insurance, roughly 40 million, a significant portion of those are people who opt out for various reasons (young healthy, single, religious reasons, etc). In reality, the number is probably somewhere around 15 million people who need insurance, but can't afford it. Why do we need the govt to come up with a new plan, which it already can't afford, to cover 300 million people, when only 15 or so million are in need? |
| Posted by: ftank May 7 2008, 02:42 PM | ||
Hospitals have means with which to recoup losses. American hospitals are required to provide emergency care to all, regardless of coverage. I went to the emergency room near a beach in Texas, and they were pretty big asshats about me paying up front or providing proof of insurance before they provided care. I was pretty pissed off that I "had" to pay for my care out of my vacation fund. This was later recouped, but still, a pain in my ass nonetheless -- especially when they are required to provide care regardless. And let's be honest, I'm not poor and I'm a healthy white guy with badass coverage. And they were asshats to me, WHY? Because numbnuts with a huge litter and minimum wage working fathers don't know how to regulate when propagating our species. Thus they can hardly afford existence, let alone health care. Why should I be punished for their lack of accountability? What gives me pause about universal health care is how it affects everyone else who bothers to go out and get a half-decent job with basic coverage. I don't even have a degree, for fuck's sakes! And then, how can one separate this situation from the naturally disabled? I like how on my Texas Gas bill, it has the option to donate for those who are unable to pay their bill. PFFT. Donate my ass. Apply my overpayments towards future payments. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 7 2008, 03:06 PM | ||
The Iraq war isn't what fucked the economy, it's the mortgage industry that did. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 7 2008, 03:13 PM | ||
do you really think thats how universal health care works? the government just foots the entire bill for everyone's health care? universal health care is meant to ensure that those 15 million you speak of aren't completely screwed over...either way there needs to be drastic health care reform because it is getting to expensive for even middle class families |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 7 2008, 03:20 PM | ||||
true, i misspoke, the iraq war has been catastrophic for the federal deficit and oil prices...both are tied in pretty strongly with economic performance |
| Posted by: Roids May 7 2008, 06:49 PM | ||
I won't disagree with this. |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 8 2008, 12:36 AM |
| I think a lot of the economic problems ties back to the Iraq War and the War on Terror. Our current Republican administration is fucking pathetic. I have never gotten a straight answer from a Republican who supports the Iraq War from the beginning. If you ask them why it was a good idea to go into Iraq, they say it's because he had terrorist ties and was going to kill us all. You would have to be the most naive motherfucker in the world to think any country in the world would even attempt a military strike against the U.S. Because as soon as they do, it's Hiroshima all over again. That's why I don't understand all this obsessed talk about Iran. Sure, the guy has said some crazy shit, but he has no say militarily. The pussy can talk all he wants, but can't back up his words. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 8 2008, 02:08 PM |
| The economy has been great during the war, and shitty during it. You can't blame the war for the economy. |
| Posted by: ShakesAllDay May 8 2008, 02:25 PM |
| The TRILATERAL COMMISSION! ... decent vid. I'm not supporting any insinuated conspiracies in the vid, but it does explain monetary systems in an understandable way. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-9050474362583451279 |
| Posted by: Roids May 8 2008, 02:29 PM | ||
You can sure as fuck blame it for the enormous national debt that continues to grow by billions each day as well as the increased instability in the mideast that has resulted. Nevermind that the conflict could still spiral out of control and involve other arab countries, causing an even greater committment and burden from the US. But at least we're takin' the fight to the terrorists!!! |
| Posted by: azfittrainer May 8 2008, 03:20 PM | ||||
Then how come for most of the year, the economy was humming along great? A strong Bull Market. I'm sure the mortgage meltdown hurt us alot more than the war. Bear/Stearns, didn't go bankrupt, becuase of debts in Iraq. |
| Posted by: Roids May 8 2008, 03:40 PM |
| The credit crunch is being felt right here and now. The enormous debt and other rammifications of elective wars are felt more in the long run. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 10 2008, 12:05 AM |
| ...and i paid $74 to fill up my jeep today |
| Posted by: Roids May 10 2008, 01:05 PM |
| Get ready to pay $100+ to fill up your ride when Hussein gets in office and tries to make the ignorant masses happy by showing he's socking it to big oil with new windfall profit taxes, which you will be paying. Or, your mom and dad will be paying. |
| Posted by: Michael218532 May 10 2008, 03:49 PM |
| i pay for my own gas but thanks for trying to be condescending... and the iraq war has more to do with high gas prices than oil company profits...thank you Walker (i guess people go by their middle names now) you make a lot of predictions, i don't remember any of them being right |
| Posted by: Will109090 May 11 2008, 01:36 AM |
| He's right about the taxes issue. If Obama raises taxes on oil companies like he hopes to do, you think ExxonMobil is going to take it in the ass from the government? We already have the 2nd highest corporate tax rates in the world. ExxonMobil will pass those profit losses to the consumer. People just don't understand that more government leads to higher prices for everyone. I've said it once, the Democratic party has done more harm to minorities and the poor than anyone else. Don't believe me? Go read Jon Stossel's "Give Me a Break". Great book written in layman's terms. He used to be a liberal reporter, but eventually became a libertarian after doing research into the wasteful government spending that goes on in this country. I was a typical college left-wing liberal up until a couple years ago when I read that book. It completely changed my view on government. |