after 4 weeks of dieting down... |
1Fast400 Forums > Members Pictures |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 12 2008, 07:50 PM |
Just thought I would try posting a pic, seeing as I've never done it and never competed. Anyone think I should give it a shot? I know I have some major weak points, but I've been fighting some hard genetics for a long time. Sorry I didn't show my legs in this pic. |
| Posted by: Singa Mar 12 2008, 08:34 PM |
| go for it dude..u got a great base, and altho i didnt see pics of u before, u look like u have a very low body fat percentage and u could definately do work in the comp good luck man |
| Posted by: Chris25533 Mar 12 2008, 09:43 PM |
| real good base, looking pretty lean as it is. What are your goals? |
| Posted by: TommyD Mar 13 2008, 06:34 AM |
| Go for it, no other way to see how you stack up to the others.....get a posing routine together |
| Posted by: Doogsy Mar 13 2008, 01:49 PM |
| Looking Solid bro! Id go for it! |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 13 2008, 08:35 PM |
| lookin good! your inner chest needs some work, but seems like every thing else is proportional. Post a shot of the wheels bro. How tall and weight? |
| Posted by: rich_55 Mar 13 2008, 09:02 PM |
| Yeah, you could certainly compete if the legs are up to par. Chest could use more thickness, but we all have things that need to be improved. Doing a local show could be a very good start. Fairly lean too. How tall are you and how much do you weigh? |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 14 2008, 09:58 PM |
| I'm not sure how much I weighed in this pic. Maybe 180-185lbs. I'm just starting to bulk up again, but I gain weight extremely slowly, otherwise it just goes to my waist. I'll hopefully get around to taking some new pictures very soon. Thanks for the compliments and encouragement. |
| Posted by: cc-10 Mar 15 2008, 12:01 AM |
| good job bro |
| Posted by: typeRob Mar 15 2008, 12:08 AM | ||||
How tall? |
| Posted by: goodskie Mar 15 2008, 01:17 AM | ||||||
how tall? |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 15 2008, 06:50 AM |
| About 5'11" |
| Posted by: Roids Mar 15 2008, 12:04 PM |
| Pretty jack'd. How much do you whey? |
| Posted by: SFW_SFW Mar 15 2008, 02:04 PM | ||
lol |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 15 2008, 08:51 PM | ||
I only use whey protein with breakfast and post workouts. I currently hit the weights once every 3-4 days for about 15 minutes, so I use about 30 grams of whey a day aside from lifting days. On those days, I use about 90 grams. As you can tell, I'm a huge Heavy Duty advocate. |
| Posted by: yeashescool Mar 15 2008, 08:58 PM | ||||
am i reading this right....... u only hit the weights for 15mins? |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 15 2008, 09:16 PM | ||||
i dont know if i read this completely wrong, but 15mins every 3 or 4 days? Also 90grams of whey is highly unnessary, 40grams is about the max your body can digest at once ne ways. Clarification is needed bro. |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 16 2008, 06:41 AM |
| You read correctly. I'm a Heavy Duty advocate. I train for about 15-20 minutes every 3-4 days. As far as my whey protein use, I meant I use 90 grams TOTAL on lifting days. On none lifting days I only use it at breakfast. Post workout, I take in about 60. How much the body can utilize at any given time is dependant on the individual and situation. Also there is no proof showing what kind of average a certain amount of muscle can absorb at a given time, especially post-training. Do I think 60 is more then enough? Yes, but I suppose I take in excess carbs post workout too. I don't think it hurts anything (unless I'm cutting) and I'm sure my bases are covered in this way. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 17 2008, 09:48 AM | ||||||
If you're lifting balls to the wall 15-20 minutes is all you need. |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Mar 17 2008, 09:50 AM |
| Those are the HIT principles. Get in, hit it hard, and get the hell out. Not a big fan myself but have tried many different approaches to it from time to time and it was great for a change up to my routine. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 17 2008, 10:38 AM |
| I don't see how 40 min per week is enough time under the weights... you could probly see alot better gains with a dif routine high intensity or not, still sounds like your cutting yourself short to me whats a typical routine look like for you? |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 17 2008, 11:05 AM |
| Try doing power cleans and squats for sets of 5 with 80% of 1 RM for 20 minutes with a 30 second rest interval and see if your not fried afterwards. |
| Posted by: Chris25533 Mar 17 2008, 11:37 AM |
| seems to be working for him from the looks of the picture |
| Posted by: Brendlinger Mar 17 2008, 02:19 PM |
| how is 40 min not enough time? You should not be in the gym with weights longer than an hour. i understand if its a little over an hour but the kids that workout for 2 hours straight are just stupid. natural homones your body releases deplete after an hour resulting in overtraining. Im in the gym 45min-1 hour maybe a little longer on ab days |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 17 2008, 02:23 PM |
| No he's in the gym 40-60 minutes a week. As in 20 minutes a session, 3 times a week. |
| Posted by: yeashescool Mar 17 2008, 04:00 PM | ||||||||
so what would a typical routine besides the one u already mentioned look like? |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 17 2008, 07:51 PM |
| EDIT: meant to quote brendilinger but yeah 40 min per week, not per session... big difference i agree you don't need more than an hour... i just choose that route because i like hitting isolation lifts but still 15-20min aint even enough time to get warmed up... even if you were doin full body thats not enough time to hit compounds to cover all bodyparts and i know AZFIT is gonna come in and mention something about olympic lifts... but the guy is talkin about competing in bbing 5'11'' and 180lbs is decent... but my point is he could prob be alot bigger with a better routine |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 17 2008, 08:13 PM |
| Still not enough to hit each body part every week. |
| Posted by: Cdubya Mar 17 2008, 08:20 PM |
| I'm 100% with Movin..I don't see how you can go once every 3 or 4 days and still hit everything in 15 mins? IMO, you need to go at least 4 days a week for 45-60 mins each..but that's just me, everyone's bodies are different I guess..Lookin good either way Gunz.. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 17 2008, 11:12 PM | ||||||||||
|
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 17 2008, 11:14 PM | ||
If you cut out all the time most people spend between sets, going to get a drink, resting, etc, the amount of time you're actually lifting is only 15-20 minutes. If you cut out all the rest 20 minutes might be all you need. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 18 2008, 03:44 AM | ||||
I don't know why i'm even trying to argue this poing... 20 min twice per week is not enough time to maximize hypertrophy no matter what intensity your working at rest time is important when you training for hypertrophy, if your hitting set after set with 30 second rest intervals, your not going to have the gas to bang out heavy reps if the dude wants any chance at competing then he needs to incorporate a traditional bodybuilding routine... not this goofy 20 min HIT bullshit |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 18 2008, 09:50 PM | ||||||
Why is it not enough time? Im asking a serious question? What exactly does it take to produce hypertrophy? |
| Posted by: yeashescool Mar 18 2008, 10:17 PM | ||||||||||||
will do |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 18 2008, 10:17 PM |
| 3-5 sets of 8-12 reps at 70-80% of maxium weight per excercise, and approx 6-10 sets per muscle group In order to achieve that, you need adequate rest periods in between sets... roughly 2-3min It's simple mathematics... Hypothetically We will say that each set including rest periods will take approx. 3 min... SO after 3 sets of squats, he has already used up 9min... THEN after 3-4 sets of lets say Bench, his 20 min are up now he's off for 3-4 days before he's back in the gym to hit back annd shoulders... where once again he has time for 1 back excercise, and 1 shoulder excercise Will he induce hypertrophy following the routine... yes, but not nearly as much as if he were to add another 20-30min to the routine and incorporate a few more lifts Now i'm sure he is hitting alot more sets than i mentioned because he is cutting way down on his rest time, and probly cruising from set to set... but that only means that he is not fully recovering between sets, and not lifting at 70-80% of his maximum weight.... I could bench 135lbs for 10 reps every 30 seconds for 20 min... but i'm not gonna get any bigger doing it |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:16 AM | ||
But who says you need to do that much work to get maximal hypertrophy? Instead of benching 135 for ten reps, why not do 285 for 3 reps? |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 19 2008, 07:53 AM |
| Shit, I guess we've all been doing this wrong. I'm gonna start lifting 5 times a week for 10 minutes each session. I'll be jacked as fuck in no time. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 09:37 AM |
| 10 minutes might not be enough, but 20-30 minutes certainly can be. Many top lifters in the world will work lift for 20-30 minutes top, same with many elite combat operators. |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 19 2008, 09:41 AM |
| Im in agreement low reps(3-5) usually are not enough to break the tissue down to the extent that it needs to be. Also this method would take a large amount of time to make quality gains. There is roughly 9 days off of each body part between workouts. Ya it can work but it just doesnt seem efficient. Its may just be me but i hit everything at least once or twice a week. |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 19 2008, 09:47 AM | ||
Lifters meaning olympic lifters? I think 90% of the people here are interested in muscle growth so I don't think anyone really cares about lifters. This is a bodybuilding forum. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 09:52 AM |
| Alot of BB'rs lift for that amount of time too. If you actually looked at the amount of muscle mass on elite Olympic lifters they are very muscular, especially in the lower body. The point is, just becuase some lifters need alot of reps/sets to build mass doesn't mean everyone does. One of the greatest Mr Olympias of all time only lifted for about 30 minutes a session. |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 19 2008, 09:59 AM |
| Well I have no idea how long heavyweight BBers train but I would say that's the minority. Of course some people hardly train at all and still looked jacked. I would say most BBers train twice a day for a couple hours since they're all juiced up. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 10:04 AM |
| Most do, but some do not. I'm just saying, there is more than one way to get jacked, and no one formula wokrs for everyone. Arnold did marathon sessions, Yates was in and out in 30 minutes. Both were multi year champions. |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 10:38 AM | ||
+1 for me as well, and it shows in your physique. The OP looks good if you want to be looking like Brad Pitt in Fight Club, but the lack of muscle thickness shows. IMO from the short workouts, yeah you'll get toned up but won't put on much muscle mass. Do a competition, but I'd go as lean as you can. My buddy who is just as big as I am at 215lbs if not bigger dropped to 178lbs and got 4th, but competitions are pretty popular here in MI and just depends on the weightclasses. If you've never been to a competition, which I'm thinking, I'd go to one and see each weight class and shoot for a class you think you'd do best in. Or check out Azfit's competition pics, nothing against Az but you see the kind of conditioning and size Az thought he was in compared to the size of the other guys beside him. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 11:46 AM | ||
Tell that to Dorian Yates |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:08 PM |
| [QUOTE=azfittrainer,Mar 19 2008, 12:46 PM] [QUOTE=Big_Ben,Mar 19 2008, 10:38 AM] [QUOTE=DownTown,Mar 19 2008, 10:41 AM] Its may just be The OP looks good if you want to be looking like Brad Pitt in Fight Club, but the lack of muscle thickness shows. IMO from the short workouts, yeah you'll get toned up but won't put on much muscle mass. [/QUOTE] Tell that to Dorian Yates [/QUOTE] Dude Dorian took mega cycles, you really don't have to work as hard in the gym as a natty builder if you are totally gassed. I really don't think the OP is injecting at the moment. If I was injecting, my time in the gym would go down too. WTF are you thinking.... |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:10 PM | ||
But to my defense, it's alot harder to pack on mass when you aren't 5'3" |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:11 PM | ||
|
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:12 PM | ||||
Height has nothing to do with anything, that statement is about the gayest excuse for pussies. Like I said nothing against Az, tard. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 19 2008, 12:14 PM |
| yeah but Yates was prob in the gym 6-7 days per week, not every 3-4 days... that makes a HUGE difference Even tho i think the actual session time of 20min is not enough, if the OP was in the gym 5 days per week i would say it could prob be done... 20 min per muscle group isnt bad My arguement is more towards the amount of time he's in the gym per WEEK, if he's lifting every 3-4 days then thats 40min per week... gives you enough time for 3-4 sets per muscle group max, it's just not enough time or work to fully break down the muscle fibers |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:17 PM | ||||||
Lol height has alot to do with it. Why do you think there are very few Pros over 5'10"? |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:17 PM | ||
And you believe everything printed in FLEX mags? Its called psyching out the competition. Yeah Arnold worked out hard as fuck, but look at the density he had over Dorian's bubblicious looking muscles. And the fact drugs weren't probably as potent, and as many different kinds back then. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:19 PM |
| I don't read FLEX, but the fact remains he won, and the other guys didn't. My point is what works for you, might not work for another guy. |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:22 PM | ||
I agree with that 100%. |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Mar 19 2008, 12:25 PM |
| [QUOTE=azfittrainer,Mar 19 2008, 10:46 AM] [QUOTE=Big_Ben,Mar 19 2008, 10:38 AM] [QUOTE=DownTown,Mar 19 2008, 10:41 AM] Its may just be The OP looks good if you want to be looking like Brad Pitt in Fight Club, but the lack of muscle thickness shows. IMO from the short workouts, yeah you'll get toned up but won't put on much muscle mass. [/QUOTE] Tell that to Dorian Yates [/QUOTE] Yates used a massively modified version of HIT. He did a lot of volume as well. He called it his working up sets. Which he did pretty damn heavy too. At least that is what I got out of watching his Training Video. |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:26 PM | ||
Yup, which is probably enough time to tone and tighten. But in his case its working for now, but I think he'll have to step it up to go beyond where he is now for added size. |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Mar 19 2008, 12:27 PM |
| Yates was just one sick mother. The amount of injuries he had and still worked through them is just amazing. |
| Posted by: Chris25533 Mar 19 2008, 12:30 PM |
| I love how everyone is so worried about everyone else on these boards. Kind of gets old quick. Let the dude do what he wants if he feels like its working and for everyone else you do what you feel is the best for yourself. Yeah maybe he could get better results from hitting the gym more often and for longer, but maybe thats all the time he has for the gym right now? The dude has a decent physique too, probably better then half of the people on here who have never showed a picture. |
| Posted by: PotentiallyFatal Mar 19 2008, 12:32 PM | ||||
U just can't pack on mass cuz your a pansy ass. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 19 2008, 12:32 PM | ||
lol it's way past him... were jus debating btw eachother now, nothing wrong wit a good clean argument |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Mar 19 2008, 12:33 PM |
| Ben - BTW, if you like the Blond Myth dvd's you'd probably really like the Yates DVD. I think it was called Blood and Guts. Awesome training vids in that. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:42 PM | ||||||
Thats true, I'm not out taking lead pipes to teenagers cars |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 12:44 PM | ||||
It only takes 1-2 sets of 90% or more of your 1 RM to tear down muscles |
| Posted by: Big_Ben Mar 19 2008, 12:44 PM | ||
Cool thanks for the info, I've always wanted that one. Yates will always be a badass! I remember hearing him talk about 1 exercise bicep programs, his reasoning was that biceps were a small muscle group, hit them hard and done....then again he blew his bicep out! I've always made better size gains hitting groups 2x a week, about 3 exercises/3-4 working sets/6-10 reps on heavy days and 10-14 on the second lighter part of the week. Strength has always gone up better hitting parts 1x a week, heavy for me. Has anyone asked this guy how long he's been working out on this program?!!!! |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 19 2008, 12:51 PM | ||||||
Ok so how do you expect to get to 90%+ work sets without doing warmup sets first? That takes time. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 01:02 PM |
| Well if you do a dynamic warm up it doesn't take much time. |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 19 2008, 02:14 PM |
| well if your telling him to go into a comp working like that, AZ then your setting him up for failure and thats not cool. He said he would like to do one and obviously he would like to place well. So he needs to increase the frequency of his work outs if he wants to do better than you did( no offense). Ive done an ameture competition( i was 18) and took 2nd place in the overall. I worked 6 days a week and had a nutritionist preparing my meals for 4months prior. If you want to place well then 15minutes every 3 or 4 days isnt going to do it. Im not bashing by any means cuz it looks like hes doing well, im just trying to help out. |
| Posted by: PotentiallyFatal Mar 19 2008, 02:19 PM | ||
go suk a dynamic cock |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 19 2008, 02:21 PM | ||||
|
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 02:59 PM | ||
I didn't tell him to do one type of workout or another. I didn't give him any advice. I simply stated that everyone saying he should train the way, that they do isn't right either. What works for movin weight, might not work for him. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 19 2008, 03:02 PM | ||||
|
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 19 2008, 04:31 PM | ||
agreed, but i'm not tellin him to do what i do... I do 90 minute sessions and hit everything twice per week... i'm not recommending that to him at all, i'm just sayin if he wants to bodybuild, then he needs a fuckin bodybuilding routine i mean he looks good but 5'11'' and 180lbs is nothing to boast about |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 19 2008, 05:30 PM |
| that was the point i was trying to make, im not good with words. |
| Posted by: ANIMAL333 Mar 20 2008, 12:46 AM | ||||
Agreed! |
| Posted by: Tswole Mar 20 2008, 06:08 PM |
| your schedule only needs a few alterations.....D-bol, anadrol, deca, test (all types will work great in combintation.) Happy growing |
| Posted by: typeRob Mar 20 2008, 11:16 PM | ||
i agree with what your saying except for this. going by stats is retarded. arnold was only 240 at 6'2 and he looked amazing. 6'2 240 is NOTHING in todays bbing. youll never see any guy with those stats look as good as him. it all depends on genetics and the way they look. not everyone has the same frame. packing loads of muscle on a small frame looks more impressive then a guy at the same weight but bigger frame. flex wheeler is a good example of this. do you focus more on what the scale says or what the mirror says? my point is stats dont mean shit in bbing. |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 21 2008, 06:24 PM |
| "...more is better though...right?" Why? Where are the grounds behind these blind statements? Where is your scientific reasoning? "No, no, just more then what I do...right?" On what grounds do you make this remark? Because my training is far from the "norm"? While far from the "norm", my training style follows more closely to the principles of physiology, muscle adaptation, and rational thinking. "No, no, just more like pros tell us to do it...right?" Cause where else are the ideas of training so much coming from? Exercise physiologists? If there are, then ask them to explain why more is needed. Ask to get a straight answer as to why more then one working set is required to stimulate maximal muscle growth. No, no, instinct tells us...right? hahaha!!!! As if there were such a thing to training. If you still talk about "instinct", don't bother me. And let the flaming begin...and this is why I don't comment much at all about training anymore on boards such as this. |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 21 2008, 07:12 PM |
| Dude i doubt ne one is going to flame you. We were just saying if you are going to, or are interested in competing then your routine would need to change. Az can tell you from first hand experience about underestimating BBing. You look pretty good but i wouldnt tell you to compete as of yet. Im pretty much the same build as you, i spend more time of developing each muscle group then i do on being massive. People were pretty much just giving Az a hard time because of his unsuccessful BBing attempt, not you. Stay strong and Keep at it bro. |
| Posted by: Cdubya Mar 21 2008, 07:26 PM |
| But 15 mins every 3-4 days? Just be glad your blessed with some good fuckin genetics..it takes me 15 mins to get in the locker room, put in my earbuds, and house my NO Shotgun before I even consider stretching..But like other's mentioned, if you want to compete, there's no way in hell you'll get anywhere with that routine..only saying it because you mentioned you wanted to compete..Do you eat a meal every 3 or 4 days too or what? |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 21 2008, 07:53 PM | ||
I never underestimated it, I just did really poorly. |
| Posted by: Chris25533 Mar 21 2008, 07:53 PM |
| I think you look good bro. Besides your inner chest lacking, everything else looks good.. You can work on that chest too.. Everyone has a weakness which can be worked on.. Keep up the good work... |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 21 2008, 08:37 PM |
| Still Az you werent ready at that point. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 21 2008, 08:37 PM |
| I know I wasn't, but i went out there anyways |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 22 2008, 12:10 AM |
| im not trying to start an E fight but why would you try to advise in bodybuilding if your not good at it, or able to do it. I wouldnt advise ppl unless i knew i could help them. You may be good at power lifting but bbing isnt ur thing. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Mar 22 2008, 12:54 AM | ||
it's cool bro, i mean if you like your training style, and are happy with your results... then it's alllll goooood I'v done my research, and made my argument... take it for what it's worth Not really here to flame you |
| Posted by: Doogsy Mar 22 2008, 06:19 AM |
| Why is it that every time some one posts looking for honest advice, it turns into an e-fight? |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 22 2008, 10:05 AM |
| Cuz Az shows up giving BBing advice. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 22 2008, 11:32 AM | ||
I wasn't advising him in bodybuilding. If you read the thread I never gave him any actual advice. |
| Posted by: accent115 Mar 22 2008, 12:36 PM |
| No one cares if you are big or not, lift how you want. |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 22 2008, 08:26 PM |
| First of all, thanks for not flaming me, and thanks for those supportive words from some of you. For those who want to stick to whatever they are doing, then by all means, do what you want. I don't have the energy to explain why I train the way I do if people aren't going to really listen and THINK about the reasoning behind it. If you want that answer, I'm happy to provide it, but if you aren't interested in looking at this from a scientific and rational view, it's really not worth any of our time. Thanks for so many responses though! |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 22 2008, 08:31 PM |
| hey bro i just want you to kick major ass at what ever comp you go into. And post pics of it. |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 22 2008, 10:10 PM |
| Thanks for the encouragement!!! |
| Posted by: DownTown Mar 23 2008, 09:36 PM |
| Dont let the e fighting scare you off, stick around , there is plenty more encouragement were that came from. It your serious about competing then let sum of use know and we will help you out. If your really interested then let me know i can guide you to a better place. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 24 2008, 10:23 AM |
| If what your doing works for you, stick with it. If you decide it's no longer working for you, try something else. |
| Posted by: joseph23573 Mar 25 2008, 08:19 AM |
| Assfagtrainer is a flamer |
| Posted by: goodskie Mar 25 2008, 03:37 PM |
| no shit |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 25 2008, 05:39 PM | ||
don't you have drugs to smoke, and houses to be evicted from? |
| Posted by: Tswole Mar 25 2008, 06:13 PM | ||
speak on....lets hear why. |
| Posted by: opfor101 Mar 25 2008, 07:12 PM | ||
I hope you sent it. |
| Posted by: rich_55 Mar 25 2008, 11:11 PM | ||
Word. I comment least in the training section and I'm a trainer. |
| Posted by: SFW_SFW Mar 26 2008, 01:18 PM |
| so if you guys think 2 hours is too long how long should someone interested in bbing be in the gym? cuz im usually there for that long, and sometimes longer. i feel like it takes me that long to do what i need to. i gotta stretch before and rest in between sets. i also have 2 training partners as of now so that takes some extra time too... |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 26 2008, 01:26 PM |
| Two plus hours means you've been stressing the body for quite a while without refueling. It could lead to catabolism. |
| Posted by: rich_55 Mar 26 2008, 01:37 PM |
| I'm occasionally in there for 1.5 hours, but the goal is always 1 hour. Regardless, I'm always downing some Purple Wraath and occasionally some carbs to prevent catabolism and promote growth. Too much rest between sets is not a good thing. You guys should be in there to smash weights and not BS. You do not have to do every exercise known to man to have a kickass, productive workout. Stretching is necessary, but doesn't really count as part of your intense training. |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 26 2008, 02:22 PM |
| I'm in there about 60-70 minutes tops. I get in about 6 or 7 different kinds of exercises, except when I train legs since squats are taxing as hell (more rest). How much shit do you do that you spend 2 hours in the fucking gym? And my rest periods probably average 2-3 minutes on the heavy stuff. |
| Posted by: rich_55 Mar 26 2008, 02:35 PM | ||
|
| Posted by: SFW_SFW Mar 26 2008, 07:12 PM |
| umm for example yesterday was chest and bis. i did flat bench, preacher w curling bar, db flies, incline bb, standing db curls, ummmm preacher hammer curls, incline db bench, and 21s. that doesnt seem like that much to me... im also doing 5x5 on bench so that takes a little longer. also trying to develop my upper chest. |
| Posted by: ShakesAllDay Mar 26 2008, 08:53 PM |
| I've honed my workouts to come in right around 50 min. And that includes my warmup. For example, today's workout was (grouped items = superset)... weighted pullup x 2 towel pullup x 2 db hammer curl x 4 cable low row x 4 db preacher curl x 4 bb deadlift x 4 bb curl x 4 Don't stop. DO WORK! |
| Posted by: willpiazza31 Mar 27 2008, 09:16 AM | ||
You could easily trim at least 30 minutes from that. Stuff like preacher hammer curls and DB flyes together should take 10 minutes tops. They're isolation movements which shouldn't require much rest time. |
| Posted by: accent115 Mar 27 2008, 02:14 PM |
| I don't normally rest more than 30 seconds in between, then again what do i know |
| Posted by: Younggunz Mar 30 2008, 09:14 PM |
| Sorry I haven't replied yet. I've been terribly busy. If you really want to know the principles of my training, I'm willing to explain it. As long as we can talk simply about the SCIENCE of physiology and exercise science. Just let me know you are interested and I'll explain...as soon as I can that is!!! |
| Posted by: fidoslim Mar 30 2008, 10:25 PM | ||
yes jason that is what it is called i have it is awsome i will have too watch that soon. |
| Posted by: azfittrainer Mar 31 2008, 10:43 AM | ||
Are you studying exercise science? |
| Posted by: Younggunz Apr 4 2008, 07:30 PM |
| I'm going to make this as brief as possible, while yet still making sure to include all the rational behind the way I train. First of all, I follow very closely to what Mike Mentzer advocated in Heavy Duty II, though I admit I do some irrational things based on my own physical desires in the gym. I know I would do better if I followed directly as he advocated, but I do some things differently, basically for my own enjoyment in the gym. You may notice I explain some things very closely to how Mentzer did. I'm sorry for that, but if one man says it so perfectly, it's hard to rationalize it better. If we approach muscle growth as a science (as it should be), we would first note that skeletal muscle grows solely out of function. In other words, muscle only grows in order to lessen a stress on the body. Muscle only grows out of function, not for some sort of cosmetic purpose. So what does that mean? It means, muscle only grows to become stronger so that added stress does not impede the body's homeostasis so deeply. If you think muscle grows for other reasons, you really need to do some studying into physiology. Getting to the point; the only thing that causes muscle growth, is the intensity of effort put forth. You can talk all you want about micro-trauma, but you are talking the equivalent of calculus, when you don't have a keen grasp on addition. I can go in depth as well as anyone on the physiology of skeletal muscle, but you must understand the basics of rational training, before getting into the "calculus" of muscle growth. Ok, so intensity is the key to growth...what does that mean? Let's look at a barbell curl. Let's say you can do 10reps with a 100lbs barbell. If every time you worked biceps, you did 10reps with 100lbs, never attempting to do 11, do you think you would ever grow? Of course not, because you've not given your body a reason to adapt (grow). It can already tolerate that level of stress. The only way to cause growth, is to increase the stress on the body further then it can tolerate. The only way to increase that stress and push the body beyond normal limits, is to train to muscular failure. Now comes the question, well how often and how much do I have to do that. Answer: far less then everyone suggests. Anyone who suggests that you must do more then one set to properly stimulate growth is talking purely out of their ass(pardon the expression). Ask anyone that recommends more then one set to failure, and you will never get a rational answer. Go ahead and ask a physical therapist, exercise scientist, MD, anyone you want and truly think about the answer they provide. It is always blind guessing with little rational behind it whatsoever. I can almost quote verbatim how most "experts" respond to the statement that one set to failure is all that is required to stimulate maximal muscle growth. Ok, so now I'm only doing one set to absolute muscular failure, how often do I have to do that? The precise amount that is necessary to allow for full recovery and full growth potential. Remember, muscle grows purely out of function, so the only reason muscle grows is to make an impedance of stress seem, well, less stressful. So, believe it or not, you should be stronger every time you enter the gym. If you enter the gym and you are not stronger then your last workout, you either did not allow enough time for recovery and growth and are over-trained, you did not meet your needs nutritionally (least likely to be true), or you did not train intensely enough to stimulate growth during your workout. Another thing to keep in mind, is that intensity and volume are INVERSLY proportional. In other words, the longer you do something, the less intense you can make it. If you disagree, I suggest you study some physics. An example; giving it your all for both events, a 100 meter sprint is much more intense then a 2 mile run. That is a physical fact that no one can deny, provided they are rational human-beings. "I cannot explain the actions of irrational people."- Mike Mentzer. Just look at the leg development of a sprinter compared to that of a distance runner. That immense muscle growth is caused by the short burst of very intense work put forth by the sprinter. The only reason people still advocate more then one set is because of tradition. There is absolutely no science behind it. It is and always has been strictly tradition, even in the "exercise science" field. It is not science, it is tradition. People tend to have an extremely hard time accepting the fact that more then one set is not needed because it goes against everything they have ever been told, even by self-proclaimed "experts" and "scientists". More work is not better, less work is not better, but the precise amount that nature requires is what is best and will give you the fastest results. Please feel free to ask questions, but please, think deeply about your replies and questions. I know I'm cutting this short, but I only have so much time. I'm willing to answer as many questions as I have time for. Train hard. Rest well. |
| Posted by: Younggunz Apr 4 2008, 07:56 PM |
One new pic...stupid camera has poor quality. I'm not sure how to fix it. It takes pictures that look like cartoons, so I switched it to black and white and they come out nicer. Sorry about that. I'll get some new ones taken soon with a better camera... |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Apr 4 2008, 08:28 PM |
| I've already said several times that I'm not totally against HIT as I've done several cycles using many different HIT methods but none of them turned out to be anything that I would want to do over the long haul. It was interesting and something that I enjoyed doing. Anyone interested in it I would suggest Mike Mentzers Heavy Duty books and his DVD. Which luckly he was able to do before he and his brother passed away. But I certainly would never do HIT again as it was fine for when I was trying to add size but would never help me achieve my goals now. Here is a con against HIT btw and a good read as well. http://www.westside-barbell.com/Articles%20Top%20Ten/PDF.Files/01PDF/HIT.pdf |
| Posted by: Younggunz Apr 4 2008, 08:29 PM |
And another; this one with color...sort of... |
| Posted by: Jason2459 Apr 4 2008, 08:31 PM |
| BTW, HIT was first drawn up by Author Jones who designed the method around his other invention. Nautilus Machines. |
| Posted by: MoVin_Weight Apr 4 2008, 09:00 PM |
| well theres nothin for me to disagree with here, i mean taking 1 set to failure is pretty typical, sometimes i do more... but i agree thats all you really need But what you didn't cover |