|
|
 |
after 4 weeks of dieting down... |  |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Applied Nutriceuticals REP

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 2539
Member No.: 108513
Joined: 27-March 06

|   |  |
 |
 |
 | QUOTE (Jason2459 @ Mar 19 2008, 01:33 PM) | | Ben - BTW, if you like the Blond Myth dvd's you'd probably really like the Yates DVD. I think it was called Blood and Guts. Awesome training vids in that. |
Cool thanks for the info, I've always wanted that one. Yates will always be a badass! I remember hearing him talk about 1 exercise bicep programs, his reasoning was that biceps were a small muscle group, hit them hard and done....then again he blew his bicep out! I've always made better size gains hitting groups 2x a week, about 3 exercises/3-4 working sets/6-10 reps on heavy days and 10-14 on the second lighter part of the week. Strength has always gone up better hitting parts 1x a week, heavy for me. Has anyone asked this guy how long he's been working out on this program?!!!!
 Current Applied Nutriceutical Stack Journal:Latest Stacks! Past App. Nutriceuticals Stack Journal: Old Stack!
"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds!" •Bob Marley
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Jubbed!

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 28816
Member No.: 53629
Joined: 7-December 04

|   |  |
 |
 |
 | QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Mar 19 2008, 01:44 PM) | | QUOTE (Big_Ben @ Mar 19 2008, 12:26 PM) | | QUOTE (MoVin_Weight @ Mar 19 2008, 01:14 PM) | | it's just not enough time or work to fully break down the muscle fibers |
Yup, which is probably enough time to tone and tighten. But in his case its working for now, but I think he'll have to step it up to go beyond where he is now for added size. |
It only takes 1-2 sets of 90% or more of your 1 RM to tear down muscles
|
Ok so how do you expect to get to 90%+ work sets without doing warmup sets first? That takes time.
"Anyway, it's not what spews out of her mouth that matters, it's what you spew into her mouth." -Roids
"im half a fag...u complete ASS" -bomb_r2
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Newbie

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 65
Member No.: 308
Joined: 8-September 02

|   |  |
 |
 |
 "...more is better though...right?" Why? Where are the grounds behind these blind statements? Where is your scientific reasoning? "No, no, just more then what I do...right?" On what grounds do you make this remark? Because my training is far from the "norm"? While far from the "norm", my training style follows more closely to the principles of physiology, muscle adaptation, and rational thinking. "No, no, just more like pros tell us to do it...right?" Cause where else are the ideas of training so much coming from? Exercise physiologists? If there are, then ask them to explain why more is needed. Ask to get a straight answer as to why more then one working set is required to stimulate maximal muscle growth. No, no, instinct tells us...right? hahaha!!!! As if there were such a thing to training. If you still talk about "instinct", don't bother me. And let the flaming begin...and this is why I don't comment much at all about training anymore on boards such as this.
|
 |
|
|
|
|