|
 |
|
 |
 |
Advanced Member
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05
| |  |
 |
 |
| QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 8 2008, 04:53 PM) | | QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 8 2008, 06:19 PM) | | QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 8 2008, 03:06 PM) | | QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 8 2008, 11:57 AM) | | QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 10:00 PM) | | QUOTE (Tswole @ Apr 7 2008, 06:23 PM) | | QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 05:19 PM) | | Thats a bad analogy and you know it. Surgery saves hundreds of thousands more lives than it kills each year. Same with cars. Can you show me stats that show more crimes/deaths are prevented by firearms each year, than are caused? Driving drunk is illegal btw, and killing someone while drunk is murder. |
i'm sure the cops prevent more crime when they have a pistol in hand. if the cops didnt have guns and neither did the criminal the cops might be in trouble unless they had numbers on their side, more officers on the scene. I mean come on....pepperspray probably wont do but so much to a deraged crackhead when he's got the idea attacking. plus most cops are weak and flabby. |
I never said cops shouldn't have guns, but normal people shoudln't
|
Wow. Lets depend on a cop entirely to save us from anyone not hopped up on drugs and not wielding more than a pocket knife.  Police have no constitutional duty/responsibility to protect individualsThey're at least 3-5 minutes away. They're much more worried about their safety and well being than they are about a complete strangers. Very few are good shots, especially in combat. |
Um yes, there job is to protect citzens. it even says on there cars "To Protect and Serve"
|
Wrong buddy.
The supreme court of the United States of America ruled that police have no duty to protect individuals, but only society as a whole. Look it up and educate yourself.
|
When did they rule that?
|
1981 I believe.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12509
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04
| | |
|
|
| QUOTE (opfor101 @ Jun 9 2008, 10:33 AM) | | QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Jun 9 2008, 10:12 AM) | | QUOTE (opfor101 @ Jun 9 2008, 10:02 AM) |
guns arent dangerous, its the people who use em for bad intentions that are dangerous. |
What about little kids who accidently shoot themselves with guns?
|
yeah but thats the kids curiosity and adults not being responsible enough.
kids do stupid things all the time anyway.
if a kid stuck his tongue into a fan and had his tongue sliced off, would you ban all future fan purchases?
guns arent made with the purpose so it can be used for high school shoot outs or gang violence or w.e
and fans arent made for the purpose for kids to stick their tongues in and get them chopped off.
its just that a few people misuse these things.
|
I'm sure that will be a small consolation when there dead. Or when kids like Columbine use them to kill other innocent kids. Kids were made for one purpose, and one purpose only, to kill things and people. Comparing them to fans is stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When seconds count...
