( Go to first unread post )
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Start Poll
Pages: (14) « First ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 
> When seconds count...
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:15 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:01 PM)
Way to twist the story fucknuts.

If five teens with bats and machetes cant even kill a single person, its pretty apparent that they're not trying to kill anyone.

You also think five 14-16 year olds can come up with $200+ each and find someone to sell them the guns? Not likely without some pretty serious drug and/or gang ties.

Well 2 kids in Colorado, armed with guns killed 12 kids and one teacher. 5 kids with bats and a machete couldn't even kill one person, so much for your theory if they wanted to kill, they would find a way. The kids in Columbine didn't have a hard time finding guns, neither did the VA Tech kid, nor the guy at Northern Illinois, nor the kid who shot up the christian school. Shall I go on?

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:44 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM)
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.

How do you know they werent out to kill anyone? Have you interview them?

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:54 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:44 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM)
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.

How do you know they werent out to kill anyone? Have you interview them?

How do you know they were?

They mention cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries. If 5 teens with 5 bats and a machete dont even break a bone or give someone a concussion I'd say they were not out to kill.

Also "likely to be charged with assault and malicious damage". Not attempted murder.

Nothing in the article suggests death (or even great bodily harm) were their intentions. Its complete bullshit that you say they would have killed 19 in the US. Everything we know suggests otherwise but you basically flat out lie and make shit up so that it conforms to your way of thinking.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:55 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:54 PM)
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:44 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM)
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.

How do you know they werent out to kill anyone? Have you interview them?

How do you know they were?

They mention cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries. If 5 teens with 5 bats and a machete dont even break a bone or give someone a concussion I'd say they were not out to kill.

Also "likely to be charged with assault and malicious damage". Not attempted murder.

Nothing in the article suggests death (or even great bodily harm) were their intentions. Its complete bullshit that you say they would have killed 19 in the US. Everything we know suggests otherwise but you basically flat out lie and make shit up so that it conforms to your way of thinking.

A teacher was injured trying to stop the kids. I didn't lie or make up any shit. You don't know they werent attempting serious bodily harm, and you are making conclusions to support your own theories as well.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:57 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:55 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:54 PM)
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:44 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM)
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.

How do you know they werent out to kill anyone? Have you interview them?

How do you know they were?

They mention cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries. If 5 teens with 5 bats and a machete dont even break a bone or give someone a concussion I'd say they were not out to kill.

Also "likely to be charged with assault and malicious damage". Not attempted murder.

Nothing in the article suggests death (or even great bodily harm) were their intentions. Its complete bullshit that you say they would have killed 19 in the US. Everything we know suggests otherwise but you basically flat out lie and make shit up so that it conforms to your way of thinking.

A teacher was injured trying to stop the kids.

Go on...
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 12:59 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:55 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:54 PM)
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 09:44 AM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 12:30 PM)
You missed my point. The Aussies weren't out to kill anybody. "...cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries." No broken bones, no concussions.

Then you go and take the story from what it is; a group of teens breaking windows and assaulting people and try to make it sound like they're out for death and it would have been a school shooting if they lived in the US.

How do you know they werent out to kill anyone? Have you interview them?

How do you know they were?

They mention cuts from broken glass and other minor injuries. If 5 teens with 5 bats and a machete dont even break a bone or give someone a concussion I'd say they were not out to kill.

Also "likely to be charged with assault and malicious damage". Not attempted murder.

Nothing in the article suggests death (or even great bodily harm) were their intentions. Its complete bullshit that you say they would have killed 19 in the US. Everything we know suggests otherwise but you basically flat out lie and make shit up so that it conforms to your way of thinking.

A teacher was injured trying to stop the kids. I didn't lie or make up any shit. You don't know they werent attempting serious bodily harm, and you are making conclusions to support your own theories as well.

The only difference being my conclusion jives with the information in the article and the outcome of the event.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 01:14 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
It jives, becuase it's what you want to believe.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 01:48 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
OK, then where are the attempted murder charges? Where are deep gashes and bloodshed from the machete strikes? Where are the missing teeth, broken bones, and concussions from being hit with a baseball bat? If they wanted to kill, why did they injure 19 different people instead of focusing their efforts on a select few? Why did they choose to do it during during an assembly when the amount of students and teachers (resistance) are highest? Why didnt they rush a classroom with only 20 kids in it taught an obese 60 year old teacher where they would only meet minimal resistance?
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 02:49 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
They haven't been charged with anything yet, assualt, murder chargers might still be forth coming.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 03:50 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 11:49 AM)
They haven't been charged with anything yet, assualt, murder chargers might still be forth coming.

Any answers or responses to the questions I asked?
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 04:08 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
How do I know why, i'm not a psychologist are you? I love that you've stayed away from the 3 year old shooting herself story though.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 04:34 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
The 5 punk teens didnt cause anything but minor superficial damage. You dont think one of them could have gotten at least one good swing to the head with a bat or machete if they wanted to? But you say if it happened here, they would come up with large amounts of money to buy guns/ammo and would have killed 19 people? Its complete bullshit.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 04:42 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 01:08 PM)
I love that you've stayed away from the 3 year old shooting herself story though.

Why? I'm not going to justify or stand up for that bullshit. Shitty parenting and even shittier firearm responsibility.

I dont think any three year olds are capable of disabling the safety and jacking a round in the chamber. Meaning they left a loaded handgun in reach of a young child. It's the parents fault 120%.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 04:57 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 04:42 PM)
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 01:08 PM)
I love that you've stayed away from the 3 year old shooting herself story though.

Why? I'm not going to justify or stand up for that bullshit. Shitty parenting and even shittier firearm responsibility.

I dont think any three year olds are capable of disabling the safety and jacking a round in the chamber. Meaning they left a loaded handgun in reach of a young child. It's the parents fault 120%.

But I'm sure eventually that same gunowner will be walking down the street, or at the mall, a gun wielding psycho will come in, and he/she will be able to stop them, thus making up for the fatality already caused by the firearm.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 04:58 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 04:34 PM)
The 5 punk teens didnt cause anything but minor superficial damage. You dont think one of them could have gotten at least one good swing to the head with a bat or machete if they wanted to? But you say if it happened here, they would come up with large amounts of money to buy guns/ammo and would have killed 19 people? Its complete bullshit.

The columbine kids, didn't seem to have a hard time acquiring large amounts of ammo/firearms, neither did the Va Tech kid.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 05:06 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 01:57 PM)
QUOTE (Brad Cowin @ Apr 7 2008, 04:42 PM)
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 01:08 PM)
I love that you've stayed away from the 3 year old shooting herself story though.

Why? I'm not going to justify or stand up for that bullshit. Shitty parenting and even shittier firearm responsibility.

I dont think any three year olds are capable of disabling the safety and jacking a round in the chamber. Meaning they left a loaded handgun in reach of a young child. It's the parents fault 120%.

But I'm sure eventually that same gunowner will be walking down the street, or at the mall, a gun wielding psycho will come in, and he/she will be able to stop them, thus making up for the fatality already caused by the firearm.

Well youre missing something: Those kinds of deaths are 100% preventable. If the guns safety was engaged she wouldnt have been able to shoot herself. If there had not been a round in the chamber, she wouldnt have been able to shoot herself. If the gun had been in a closet on a high shelf she wouldnt have been able to shoot herself. If the gun had a trigger lock installed, she wouldnt have been able to shoot herself. If the gun had been in a locked safe she wouldnt have been able to kill herself.

If the parents had taken an extra 30 seconds to do anything mentioned above the little girl wouldnt have shot herself.
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 05:09 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
All gun related deaths are preventable, and very simply, GET RID OF THE GUNS.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 05:13 PM
Quote Post
Advanced Member
3 Percent of Max Posts3 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 941
Member No.: 57513
Joined: 7-January 05

 
QUOTE (azfittrainer @ Apr 7 2008, 02:09 PM)
All gun related deaths are preventable, and very simply, GET RID OF THE GUNS.

So you are in favor of banning cars to prevent innocent fatalities in DUI crashes?

Also in favor of banning risky medical procedures because the doctor might mess up?
PMEmail Poster Top
Posted: Apr 7 2008, 05:19 PM
Quote Post
I have come here to do two things, kick ass, and chew bubble gum
43 Percent of Max Posts43 Percent of Max Posts

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 12715
Member No.: 51161
Joined: 16-November 04

 
Thats a bad analogy and you know it. Surgery saves hundreds of thousands more lives than it kills each year. Same with cars. Can you show me stats that show more crimes/deaths are prevented by firearms each year, than are caused? Driving drunk is illegal btw, and killing someone while drunk is murder.

user posted image
PMEmail Poster Top
Reply to this topic
Start new topic
Start Poll
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
« Next Oldest | Off Topic | Next Newest »
Pages: (14) « First ... 10 11 [12] 13 14 
Topic Options