Well, after reviewing the information on www.r-lipoic.com, I've come to one conclusion. The racemic lipoic acid is the best option at this time for those interested in disease prevention. The evidence to support the claims of AOR (www.r-lipoic.com) is paper thin. For instance, they took one study on rats (or mice?) and concluded that the racemic form could shorten lifespan while the R(+) form could lengthen lifespan. However, the study was flawed. The animals that were fed the racemic lipoic acid were fed a huge amount, far more than those fed either the R or S forms individually. And the animals fed the S form were fed far more than those fed the R form. So the changes in lifespan were not due to the form but simply the amount. Incidentally, The animals fed only the S form also lengthened lifespan.
Other than that, there is not one coherent argument on the site.
Now for the downside of using only the R form. To my knowledge, no studies on bioavailability have been done on using the R form alone orally. So, if you use
R-ALA or K-RALA (aka
potassium lipoate), caveat emptor. And companies vary greatly in their production methods. Not to mention that the vast majority of beneficial studies in humans used the racemic form. Also, what would the correct dosing be? Dosing studies in humans were done with the racemic form. It would be foolish to think that just cutting the dose in half will give you the same benefits. It is far more complicated than that. And the final point, the racemic form is cheaper and proven effective. So, why waste your money on an unproven product?
The R form may eventually be proven to be the best form for supplementation, but that is years ahead. We need human studies and bioavailability studies to learn the differential benefits between the R and racemic forms.
Dave